The historical factors related to Taiwan's particular cultural development have resulted in a society largely based on tolerance. The country has many unique cultural aspects. Not only are there Aboriginal cultures, but also a cultural influence from the early Minnan and Hakka immigrants. The country is also influenced by the Dutch, Spanish and the Japanese -- and the culture of those who followed the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to Taiwan after they lost the Chinese civil war.
Modern economics tends to overlook the sources of creativity found in a diversity of cultures. This creativity has developed against a rich cultural background. Figuring out how to make the Taiwanese people understand the rich cultural backgrounds that surround them, and turning it into an industry to improve our quality of life, is a goal worth striving for.
Economic development strategies put too much emphasis on productivity growth and ignore quality of life. The way in which local cultural traits have been ignored highlights the lack of effective, creative planning.
As average personal incomes increase, Taiwanese people pay more and more attention to quality of life, travel and leisure time. One way to encourage people to travel domestically and promote local economic development is to highlight the many cultural backgrounds within Taiwan. Proper marketing strategies would be a boon for the local tourism industry.
Taiwan is a society of unlimited vitality and rich with folk customs and traditions. The King Boat ceremony in Tungkang Township, Pingtung County; the Lantern Festival fireworks display in Yenshui, Tainan County; the Matsu pilgrimage that begins in Tachia, Taichung County; and the water lantern activities during the Pudu festival in Keelung are just a few examples. In addition, activities highlighting the Hakka Tung Blossom Festival, and the Aboriginal Harvest, Ancestral and Hunting Ceremonies are all well known by both locals and foreigners alike.
In order to improve the tourism industry and elevate the quality of life, the government should encourage county and city officials to give free rein to diverse sources of creativity and hold a multitude of different local traditional festivals, ceremonies and theme exhibitions in order to have each city and county develop at least one special attraction.
This would draw even more domestic and foreign tourists and create opportunities for local economic development. I think that by taking advantage of our cultural foundations, we could get tourism going and invigorate the economy.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation, a senior researcher at Yale University and a professor of law at the New York Law School.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS