If it is the objective of terrorists to drive people mad, then the Jordanian serial killer who kidnapped Kenneth Bigley and his two US colleagues, is doing a fantastic job on us. The media and large sections of public opinion currently seem to be intent on rewarding him for his extraordinary brutality. He calls, we lean towards him. He makes impossible demands and we indulge in recriminations about whether they can be fulfilled. Why, fellow Britons, do you think that Zarqawi slit the throats of two US civilians so quickly, but has hung on for so long before murdering our Liverpudlian? Sentiment? A liking for the Beatles? So we would do exactly what we have been doing. And somehow he knows we have been doing it.
The father of Daniel Pearl, who was one of the first westerners to be killed on camera (long before the invasion of Iraq), has called these murders "exhibition killings." They are committed so that the pleas of the doomed, the statements of the killers and the murders themselves can be shown and transmitted. If there were no Internet, no television stations beaming pictures, no newspaper photos of men in hoods, then the chances are greater that no one would be beheaded.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Instead, I am told, we have British journalists among others, monitoring the executional websites round the clock so that they can be the first with the news and the pictures. The severing of heads is then much demanded on the Internet, the images of Zarqawi and his demands are given full play on stations like al-Jazeera, truncated versions appearing on British TV stations, and still images on newspaper front pages. If there is such a thing as the oxygen of publicity, then we are giving it, to this and other butchers by the tank-full.
I think we should stop. If we don't exercise some self-censorship then the escalating kidnapping and killing of journalists will make our jobs impossible in any case. We will trade the ability to print the pictures of the men in masks for the ability to report from anywhere where such people may be operating.
My proposal is that we should not broadcast images, appeals and statements that clearly vindicate the Nazi-like criminality of men like Zarqawi. Just the bald facts of the case and nothing more. We must stop being naive accomplices to exhibition killings.
And organizations and individuals who want to help should reconsider the notion of sending appeals through "mediators." Who are these mediators and what are they mediating? A slightly smaller eternal Caliphate? The orderly withdrawal of the Jews from the area of Old Palestine?
When one campaigner in Blackburn told The Guardian that, "[UK Foreign Secretary Jack] Straw is not doing enough by simply stating that we do not negotiate with terrorists," what was he asking for? The circumstances in which the British government negotiated with the IRA (it is often forgotten) was when that organization indicated that it wanted to end the "armed struggle." That's the only negotiation that's possible.
Suppose, for a moment, that we in Britain faced a fascist insurgency, which kidnapped a few Jews and black people. Should we negotiate for their lives by releasing Neo-Nazi bombers and racist murderers? Or would we calculate how many more Jews and black people would, as a result, wind up in cellars with knives to their throats?
It is, I know, different for the families of kidnapped victims, whose most obvious responsibility is to their relatives. Even so, and even at a terrible time like this, they should think about the consequences for others. It may be that Paul Bigley has calculated that the more severe he is about British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the more likely he is to see his brother alive. I don't know. But if so he ought to be aware that his criticisms of the prime minister for being inactive, and of the Americans for sabotaging any release, are not just unfair but dangerous.
Had Dr Germ left jail, Zarqawi would have demanded that all the other women prisoners be released, prisoners denied by the Iraqi authorities but estimated (on what basis, I don't know) in the hundreds by the pro-insurgent Association of Muslim Scholars.
And what would Blair have said to the kidnappers in the fax that Bigley wanted him to send? "Dear Beheaders, spare our man where you have murdered so many others. He deserves to be killed less"? It is Zarqawi who holds Bigley, Zarqawi who -- leaning always to the side of death -- has the power, Zarqawi who -- unwanted by the Iraqi people -- may deliver "the kiss of death" to his hostage.
We may not know their names yet, these victims of the future, but if we give in -- if we fool ourselves into thinking there is a negotiation to be had -- then other people's brothers will surely die.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past