Now that former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) has retired as chairman of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) Central Military Commission, President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) hold on power is now official and comprehensive. The advent of the Hu era brings with it enormous risks and challenges, for most of China's advantages have already been exploited in the course of the Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and Jiang eras; now, old problems are piling up.
There are also many new problems. The result is a massive "deficit" of advantages. How Hu will deal with these accumulated difficulties and how he will find a balance between the spontaneous changes taking place in society and the need to maintain the primacy of the CCP will be the most important questions of his presidency.
The biggest difference between this era and those of Deng and Jiang is that the strategy of using market expansion to obscure social problems and maintain stability through the creation of wealth is now past its use-by date. Political and social reform can no longer be avoided. For Hu, this situation is both a challenge and an opportunity. Now that supreme power over the party, the government and the military is concentrated in his hands, the way he will be judged by history will depend entirely on how he decides to act.
There is no reason to be too optimistic about what Hu will do. From his track record we can see that he is a typical product of the CCP's training, and his thinking is still firmly confined within those limits. As the head of the CCP, his interest lies in serving the interests of the party rather than those of the people. He will rise or fall depending on the fortunes of the party, and this is what he will focus on. He is unlikely to hurt the party to benefit the people. In his current situation he is unlikely to act as the "supreme emperor" in the manner of Jiang, but he is still constrained by the demands of the party, and his position is not yet fully consolidated. He is still some distance away from being able to act as he pleases, so it is still difficult for us to know what he really thinks. All we are able to do is watch and wait.
But at the same time, there is no reason to be too pessimistic either. Politicians are constrained and guided by circumstances, so even if we cannot see in Hu any clear signs of democratic tendencies, China's regressive political system has already shown itself to be a major impediment to progress, and dealing with it will necessarily be Hu's first priority. Looking at his track record, he has at least left room for reform, as reflected by his statements at the Fourth Plenum of the 16th CCP Central Committee, when he spoke of making development the party's first priority and of pursuing "scientific rule, democratic rule and rule by law."
When the development of
a society makes claims on its rulers, they are eventually forced to bow to these demands, willing or not. We don't have to be too pessimistic because there is no reason to be so about the direction in which society is developing. If the pressure exerted on Hu by the public is great enough, then it is possible that he may end up standing on the right side of the judgement of history.
From a broader perspective, whether Jiang is out or Hu is in is not the most important question. The two decisive factors in China's future are, firstly, the development of its politics, economy and society; and secondly, the interaction of various sociopolitical forces. It is still uncertain what effects these will have. What is certain is that the Hu era will be one of massive change for China.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations.
TRANSLATED BY Ian Bartholomew
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US