Since March 20, pan-blue groups have been bringing constant complaints about what they call "Bulletgate" to the international community. A pan-blue fringe organization recently sent an e-mail to all members of the US Congress comparing President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to Adolf Hitler. Green-camp legislators have hit back, saying that the blue camp is discrediting Taiwan. The Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence (新聞公害防治基金會) has said that another international complaint by a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) think tank, Press Freedom in Taiwan Endangered (陷入險境的台灣新文自由), also promotes falsehoods.
The internationalization of domestic issues in an attempt to get the international community to mediate is a common occurrence. The problem is not that complaints are brought to the international community, but rather that the statements are untrue. In the past, the KMT complained that the tangwai (黨外, outside the party) movement internationalized its complaints, and now the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) complains that the KMT is doing the same thing. Although such a change may be ironic, it is a political reality.
During decades of martial-law rule, the KMT kept a tight grip on the state apparatus. Trying to protect themselves and realize their ideals, could dissidents afford not to take their complaints abroad? If not for US intervention, wouldn't members of the tangwai movement such as Lei Chen (雷震), Bo Yang (柏楊), Li Ao (李敖), Sun Li-jen (孫立人) and Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) have been extinguished? And without international intervention, would Chinese dissidents such as Wang Dan (王丹) and Wei Jingsheng (魏京生) still be alive today?
With increasing globalization, people from every country can air their grievances beyond their nation's borders, in some cases getting the UN to intervene to stop genocide and political repression. International pressure brought an end to racial apartheid in South Africa and stopped the massacres in former Yugoslavia. Without international concern, there would still be violence in East Timor, Iraq would still occupy Kuwait and Taiwan would have been swallowed up by China. Didn't Chen Shui-bian also appeal to the UN press corps to accuse China of suppressing Taiwan?
The method by which a complaint is brought to international attention may not be important, but it is extremely important to establish the facts. If too many of your complaints turn out to be unfounded, they will be very quickly revealed in this information age. And then, just like in the story where a boy cried wolf once too often, no one will believe you later on.
By comparing Chen to Adolf Hitler, the blue camp has violated the facts. Although Taiwan is purchasing arms from the US, these purchases are aimed at self-defense. No foreigner would believe that Chen is another Hitler. Such a negative campaign is a simply stupie, the same thing as shooting oneself in the foot or slapping one's own face.
The blue camp's Bulletgate booklet was not very smart either. How could one unearth the facts without an investigation? Besides, how can such an argument convince people when it contradicts the judgment of the pan-blues' chosen forensic expert, Henry Lee (李昌鈺)?
As for the question of whether press freedom in Taiwan has regressed, a conclusion can hardly be reached since different people have very different feelings about the matter. Nevertheless, the government has never cracked down on press freedom through any political means, and has only demanded that the KMT return its broadcasting licenses because of the KMT-owned monopoly created in the past, when there was no separation between party and state. Such a counterattack by vested interests lacks legitimacy and is immoral. What's more, Reporters Sans Frontieres praised the nation as a model of press freedom in its latest report published this year. What good will it do to wash one's dirty linen abroad anyway? It will only irritate others, and expose our own defects.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS