Never before in the history of the Olympics Games has a country receiving a gold medal been unable to hear its national anthem and see its national flag on display during the award ceremony. Optimists may say that sports and politics are separate matters. But for pessimistic thinkers, Taiwan's recent experience is cause for national sadness.
The country has already had a heated debate over the nation's name. All the names suggested -- "Taiwan, Republic of China" or "Taiwan, ROC" -- only show that Taiwanese are as much afraid of declaring independence as they are of being unified with China. Even as China arbitrarily puts down Taiwan in the international community, the nation still cannot consider a wording that doesn't include "China." People cannot help but ask: "Who are we?"
Who are we? is also the title of a new book by Samuel Huntington, a US political scientist whose theory about the clash of civilizations impressed global readers in early 90s. This time, instead of looking at international conflicts from a macro perspective, he focuses on internal US issues that arise from the coexistence of different ethnic groups. He criticizes recent Latin-American immigrants for their inability to leave behind their motherland and embrace the American dream. He argues that their maintenance of a strong ethnic identity -- one that is incompatible with that of the country's earlier immigrants -- will hamper progress.
Of course, we do not mean to adopt Huntington's view in its entirety. However, some of his points can be applied in the context of cross-strait relations. Political mistrust leads Beijing to constantly criticize the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government for its attempts to stop using the word "China" when referring to Taiwan. At the same time, Beijing blocks the use of the name Taiwan internationally. As a result, Taiwan is no longer called China, and China dares not let Taiwan be Taiwan.
Beijing's intention behind this is not difficult to grasp. It wants the Taiwanese people to feel confused about their own identity. Though this strategy may not lead to Taiwanese people identifying themselves with China, it prevents them from having a fixed identity and so makes it more difficult for Taiwanese people to establish their own country.
The establishment of a sovereign nationality requires collective will. Meanwhile, the population also relies on the country's power to direct and shape concepts surrounding its nationality. Therefore, in such an "imagined community," the collective force germinated from nationality must focus on building up a new country and dissolving the existing one. This is the most difficult step in the process of moving from the concept of "population" to a "nationality" and finally, to a sovereign "country."
China is attempting to interfere with Taiwan's collective will, thus staining its nationality and making the task of building a country nothing but a dream for the Taiwanese people. Beijing's international pressure to prevent calling Taiwan "Taiwan" is nothing but cultural hegemony. Unfortunately, rather than fight against such bullying, we jump into China's trap and thereby put our fate in its hands.
Obviously, name rectification is the only path to take to reach the goal of a sovereign country based on Taiwanese identity. If we don't call Taiwan "Taiwan," for generations to come, our children will never hear their national anthem or see their national flag in the Olympics. They will always wonder who, exactly, they are -- and that is the true sadness of being Taiwanese.
Wang Kun-yi is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies of Tamkang University.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with