Politics in Taiwan never seems to change. Every time we amend the Constitution, everyone rejoices, as if we'll have peace on earth ever after. But after a few years, numerous complaints are directed against the amended Constitution, and there is renewed discussion about another round of amendments. This has happened time and time again.
Former President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) amended Taiwan's Constitution six times during his term. Each time he raised the banner of reform, each time he received the support of the ruling and opposition parties, and each time the media were in favor. But what was the result? What has happened to the 30 years of stability that he promised us?
President Chen Shui-bian (
There are two simple questions that have to be asked.
First, if the downsizing of the legislature and the new electoral system will not come into force until February 2008 (when the 7th legislature convenes) why can't it be dealt with in 2006, when other matters of constitutional amendment will be dealt with? Why did it have to be dealt with in an extraordinary session as if we were about to run out of time?
Second, the procedural rules for the impeachment of a president or vice-president are of relatively minor urgency, and unlike the downsizing of the legislature, there is no pressure via public opinion. So what's the rush?
Actually, the answer is very simple. With the year-end legislative elections approaching, no party wants to be accused of standing in the way of reform. Anyone who opposed legislative downsizing would surely be labeled a reactionary. And the writing of impeachment procedures into the Constitution was clearly a quid pro quo that had been agreed to by the parties beforehand.
Moreover, the most absurd aspect of the process of constitutional amendment was the public hearings convened by the Executive Yuan. During these hearings, the vast majority of participating academics opposed downsizing.
But the legislature went ahead and did the exact opposite of the majority opinion.
Public hearings are an important aspect of consultative democracy, and although their conclusions are not legally binding, to ignore entirely the majority opinion makes these hearings meaningless, humiliating the participating scholars, and revealing the "anti-professionalism" of the legislators from both camps.
Taiwan's political chaos and the abuse of authority are all directly or indirectly associated with the nation's fragmentary Constitution. Although this Constitution is a creation and reflection of various political forces, it must reflect political realities. But a constitution that is totally oriented to practical politics will mean that it must constantly make compromises in the face of political realities and will require constant amendment.
Politics might be compared to baseball, in which various tactics -- such as stealing bases, short hits and so on -- are used to win points. But in constitutional amendment, one can never lose sight of the overall strategy, and there are really no tactics to speak of.
The Democratic Progressive Party may be opening the champagne to celebrate winning an inning. But the nine innings are far from over and we have no idea what the final result might be.
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist magazine.
TRANSLATED BY Ian Bartholomew
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers