Several Asian visitors to Honolulu trooped down to a local cinema the other day to see the controversial film produced by Michael Moore, Fahrenheit 9/11. They came out astonished, not by the film's vehement criticism of President Bush but by the US freedom the film reflected.
Said an Indian: "I am amazed that you have the freedom to make such a film. In my country, which is a democracy, we could never have shown such a film."
A Vietnamese, whose country is not a democracy, said: "I thought the movie was very unfair to your president but Michael Moore is still walking around free."
Similarly, visiting South Korean editors were taken to a laboratory where the repatriated remains of Americans who died in the Korean and Vietnam wars are painstakingly identified.
"I was really surprised," said one editor, "that you care so much that you go to all that trouble to find out who each one was. I think that shows American values."
In another instance, a Russian in a social gathering for Asians hosted by Americans, observed: "Look at the Americans, they just blend in like everyone else. If this had been held by other people, you can be sure everyone would know who was putting it on."
All this raises an intriguing -- and troubling -- question: If the Americans are such free, caring and unassuming people, why is their image so bad across the Muslim world and among friends and allies in Europe and East Asia? Put another way, why can't the US get its message across to other people when it has an elaborate communications apparatus in its press, radio and television, the world's most persuasive advertising industry and legions of public relations experts?
Part of the reason may be that the Bush Administration doesn't know how or doesn't care. The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, was asked in Chicago earlier this month what could be done about the vicious anti-American propaganda emanating from al-Jazeera, the Muslim news agency based in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar, and other Muslim sources.
Rumsfeld said that al-Jazeera and others "have persuaded a pile of people that what's happening [in Iraq] is a terrible thing." He asked rhetorically: "Will we survive it? Yes. Is there anything we can do about it? No."
Faint signs this week suggested that the Bush administration has become aware of the issue. The president's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice said in a speech: "We are obviously not very well organized for the side of public diplomacy." She said: "The victory of freedom in the Cold War was won only when the West remembered that values and security cannot be separated."
An expert on the Middle East who serves on a White House advisory group, however, was scathing. Shibley Telhami was quoted in the Washington Post: "Three years after September 11, you can say there wasn't even much of an attempt, and today Arab and Muslim attitudes toward the US and the degree of distrust in the US are far worse than they were three years ago ... bin Laden is winning by default."
One of Rumsfeld's predecessors, James Schlesinger, secretary of defense in the Nixon and Ford Administrations, was equally critical. Writing in The National Interest, Schlesinger says: "We have failed to convey to the Iraqis what our intentions are-or have conveyed them belatedly. Consequently, all too many excellent and well-intentioned actions on our part have not gotten through to the Iraqi public."
"It is almost as important that such plans or such actions be understood, as that they be executed," he says. The US-funded TV station in Iraq, al-Iraqiya, he writes, "has not been well designed to attract an audience and has thus been peripheral for Iraqi viewers," an assessment supported by US surveys in Iraq.
The 9/11 Commission Report widened the argument with a plea that the US engage in the struggle of ideas. Pointing to the plummeting image of the US, it said: "The US government must define what the message is, what it stands for. We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors."
"If the US does not act aggressively to define itself in the Islamic world," the commission concluded, "the extremists will gladly do the job for us."
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Honolulu.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US