Let's face it. For the past four years, Taiwan's politics have been driven by domestic considerations. The direct result has been a difficult diplomatic environment for the nation that stems largely from China's rise. China is growing both economically and militarily. But more importantly, in recent years China has reached out to the world and exerted increasing influence in global affairs. Under the doctrine of "great power diplomacy," Beijing has launched a series of diplomatic initiatives to improve its international status.
That explains why President Chen Shui-bian (
To what extent has the nation dealt with the rise of China's global influence? Premiere Yu Shyi-kun and Chen are scheduled to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Central America this month. And while most domestic attention has focused on post-election political wrestling between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, the Chen administration did score some political points through low-key diplomatic maneuverings.
Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Jen-chang (蘇貞昌) visited the Philippines in early June and allegedly met with high-ranking government officials. Around the same time, Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) made his first trip to Taiwan since 1992 and exchanged information with political and economic heavyweights in Taipei.
Those diplomatic interactions illustrate a structural transformation of the country's foreign policy orientation. Only by redefining a grand strategy and reallocating limited resources can the nation earn more international recognition. During his first term, Chen unveiled his diplomatic philosophy of advancing a new image for Taiwan as a responsible member of the international order. However, no major progress has been made, except for increased support from the US and Japan on Taiwan's bid for observer status in the World Health Organization.
After successfully winning reelection, Chen initiated steps to broaden Taiwan's ties with its neighbors. Su and Lee's visits serve as good examples of the administration's relocating its "Go South" policy to southeast Asia. The renewal of the "Go South" policy will diversify Taiwan's economy away from overdependence on China. Consolidating Taiwan's current diplomatic support is crucial, given China's attempt to buy off countries and peel them away from Taiwan. This consolidation is not only strategically necessary but also politically urgent.
Finally, for Taiwan's leaders to break through Chinese obstructions and visit countries without diplomatic ties to Taiwan is not sufficient -- although such visits are not without significance. The idea of Taiwan "walking out into the world" is to move beyond the narrow focus on political interests to a focus on creating long-term, stable relationships.
In this regard, Taiwan should utilize its economic power and democratic performance to foster international cooperation. Democracy is what separates Taiwan from China. The peaceful transition of power in 2000 was a milestone for this robust democracy. Chen's successful reelection demonstrated the deepening of democracy. Therefore, the government should play the "democracy card" to distinguish itself from Beijing's authoritarian rule and win worldwide endorsement.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past