Four years after black voters all but ignored US President George W. Bush at the ballot box, the Republican Party is still struggling to make itself more attractive to them and other minorities.
To improve on his paltry 8 percent support among blacks in 2000, an unusually low level for the winner in a presidential race, the party is wooing blacks in battleground states with new advertising campaigns, voter registration drives on college campuses, the appointment of a "steering committee" of prominent black leaders to promote Bush's policies and a national tour of party officials with the flamboyant boxing promoter Don King.
Bush and his Democratic opponent, Sen. John Kerry, are locked in an exceptionally tight race, and many black Republicans say that even a small increase in minority support could push the president over the top.
YUSHA
But they also say that any such minimal gains would meet only the needs of a close campaign rather than those of a larger strategy to expand the party's future base. And, they add, incidents like Bush's decision two weeks ago not to speak at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) convention only make the challenge more daunting.
White House officials note that Bush does plan to address the annual meeting of the predominantly black National Urban League on Friday in Detroit.
"I know they're doing all they can, with radio, TV and direct mail," said Bishop Keith Butler, pastor of the Word of Faith International Center in Southfield, Mich., one of 61 members of the president's steering committee that was unveiled a week ago. "But nine of 10 African-Americans know nothing of what George Bush has done that affects their community. I'd like to see the party trumpet what he's done better."
Alvin Williams, president and chief executive of Black America's Political Action Committee, which supports conservative candidates, said, "With respect to expanding the base of the Republican Party, we need a long-term strategy, not just an election-cycle strategy."
The party's 1996 vice presidential nominee, former Rep. Jack Kemp of New York, who remains an influential fiscal conservative, was even more critical of its efforts to expand its base among minority voters.
"We've never done enough," Kemp said.
"I always thought that it's not good for America for one party to take minorities for granted and for our party to blow them off," he added. "We had a great history with African-American voters, and we walked away from it."
Republicans are also facing a challenge in courting Hispanics, a fast-growing bloc that delivered 35 percent of its votes for Bush in 2000, compared with 62 percent for Al Gore.
Bush remains reasonably popular in states with large Latino populations, like Arizona, Texas and Florida, where his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush, wins consistently high approval ratings from Cuban-Americans and other Hispanics. But Latino leaders say the president has largely turned his back on them, squandering good will he built as governor of Texas and as a presidential candidate by promising to improve education, health care and economic opportunities for Hispanic communities.
Speaking last year at the annual convention of the National Council of La Raza, the group's president, Raul Yzaguirre, accused the Bush administration of "pinata politics," explaining, "They blindfold you and hope you are satisfied with a few trinkets that fall to the ground."
In an interview this week, Yzaguirre said, "That situation is still very much the case," and predicted that Bush would be hard pressed to reach the level of Hispanic support he had four years ago.
Maria Cardona, a Clinton administration official who is now director of the Hispanic Project for the New Democratic Network, said Hispanic voters were not yet familiar enough with Kerry to embrace him as they did Bill Clinton and Gore.
"But he has the upper hand," Cardona said of Kerry. "He needs to do more and define himself."
On the other hand, she said, in the last three years "President Bush has completely lost all the ground he gained."
Mel Martinez, who resigned as housing secretary to run for the Senate in Florida, disagreed, arguing that Bush was doing "incrementally better" among Hispanic voters.
"Overall, this will happen in time, not overnight," he said of Republicans' appeal to Latinos. "Hispanics are very much in tune with our message."
Ed Gillespie, the Republican national chairman, conceded that the party had failed to energize substantial numbers of black and Latino voters despite administration policy positions that many Republicans argue would benefit them and despite the a belief among many blacks and Hispanics that Democrats take them for granted.
"We've been flat for three cycles," Gillespie said of black support for Republicans in recent presidential elections. "We have to do a better job getting the message to African-American voters, although I believe we're starting to have an impact."
Gillespie and other Republicans contend that the administration has been far better for minority voters than they might realize. Party leaders cite the appointment of blacks to prominent positions, like Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and speak of Bush's support for some programs popular in low-income communities, like school vouchers, as evidence of his respect for issues important to minorities.
"George Bush has a compelling story to tell about public policy initiatives geared toward the empowerment of minorities, particularly those with low and moderate incomes," said J. Kenneth Blackwell, the Ohio secretary of state, another steering committee member.
But more black Democrats say Bush has taken positions on other issues that harm their communities, like opposition to affirmative action, refusal to adequately fund his No Child Left Behind educational program and his nominations of federal judiciary candidates who weaken civil rights gains.
Marc Morial, former Democratic mayor of New Orleans and now president of the National Urban League, said the presidential race was so close that black and Hispanic voters in Ohio, Michigan and other swing states could decide it.
"There's a potential to have an increased turnout," Morial said of black voters of both parties. "But underneath, there is a bit of cynicism in the African-American community about whether it matters who's in charge. We want the candidates to talk about what our issues are. We want to be part of the debate."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers