The Kaohsiung City Council by-election resulted in defeat for most of the candidates from the vote-buying families.
Some people were glad that a clear stream had emerged in the mire of politics, as witnessed by the rejection of vote-buying tactics by a more thoughtful section of the Kaohsiung electorate. Several candidates with a clean image have been elected and the vote-buying families have now been admonished. But is it justified to assert that Kaohsiung residents are now a responsible electorate? I don't think so.
Voter turnout in the election was very low, just 34 percent of the electorate. But in reviewing local elections over the past few years, we discover that a low turnout rate has become the norm in council elections.
That people are disappointed with "black gold" politics and are unwilling to vote for corrupt candidates or their relatives is a positive interpretation of the low voter turnout. Maybe the indifference of "swing voters" can be healed over time and by the emergence of better candidates, but when the turnout continues to decline, the problem becomes much more serious. The voter turnout is an indication of people's willingness to participate in local affairs, and also a reflection of their civic responsibility.
The Kaohsiung City Council by-election raises a number of issues. If low voter turnout can make people think more deeply about who should be allowed to lead local affairs, I think this will be much more effective than simply ousting corrupt politicians.
But if the electorate had not become so weary of politics, people like former council speaker Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) would not have been able to ignore the public and buy their way into office. Moreover, council members who once had a good political image would not have been able to make a pact with people such as Chu, in the misguided belief that "accumulated wrongs make a right."
The by-election and its result did not at all deal with fundamental problems ingrained in our political system. Politicians like Chu continue to hold power. The electorate should insist on electing only virtuous people to create a government which has both privilege and responsibility. This is just a part of how the electorate can monitor its government. They should also make sure representatives of the people refrain from profit-driven decision making and maintain ethical behavior through pressuring their leaders to pass laws to that effect.
In other words, the electorate should be vigilant in the face of corruption within government and insist on a high level of transparency.
This kind of civic awareness can enforce checks and discipline on politicians, and is the only way to ensure the smooth running of autonomous governments.
While everyone was busy discussing the number of seats obtained by various parties and how many seats were won by candidates from vote-buying families, I think it is more important that we debate whether or not the electorate is being enslaved by a political process they do not or cannot control.
How can we prevent politicians from hijacking the political process and make the people active participants and watchdogs of the political process? I believe that this is the most important question Kao-hsiung City councilors, and indeed, the Taiwanese people, must ask.
Chiu Li-li is a Tainan City councilor
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US