From the beginning, gay marriage has been an issue that US President George W. Bush has tried to finesse.
Under election-year pressure from his fundamentalist political base, Bush endorsed the effort to adopt a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage. He recently turned up the volume on the issue, talking about about it in his weekly radio address and calling wavering senators in an attempt to shore up support for the measure as it headed toward a crucial procedural vote.
But after endorsing the measure in February, he would often go weeks without mentioning it in public, suggesting a personal and/or political reticence about pushing it too hard. And when he did raise the topic, he was careful to modulate his message to avoid alienating moderate voters, warning in particular against allowing the issue to become an excuse for gay-bashing.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"What they do in the privacy of their house, consenting adults should be able to do," Bush said during one campaign stop in Pennsylvania, seeking to distinguish between private behavior and giving legal sanction to same-sex marriages.
"This is America. It's a free society. But it doesn't mean we have to redefine traditional marriage," he said.
hedging his bets
By hedging his position, if only a bit, Bush may have insulated himself somewhat from the sting of the defeat the proposed amendment suffered in the Senate.
But the way in which the proposal went down with a whim-per, short of a simple majority much less the two-thirds of the Senate needed for approval, raised questions about whether the White House had fundamentally misjudged the nation's attitude on the issue.
And the vote left even some of Bush's own advisers wondering if his backing of the amendment did not hurt him politically more than it helped by further stoking opposition to him from the left.
"It's a net loss for Republicans politically," said one prominent Republican in Washington who works closely with the White House.
"It does nothing for our base, because they're grumpy about not having it, and it energized a significant portion of their base. I guarantee you that they gay community will give twice as much money and work harder for Kerry now, not so much because they care about marriage per se, but because this effort plays to their fears that we're homophobic," the Republican said.
While polling has generally found that most Americans are opposed to gay marriage, it has also shown that few people see the issue, or the proposal for a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as being only between a man and a woman, as being a priority for the country.
Polls and focus groups have repeatedly found that the subject barely registers with voters, if it registers at all, at a time when most people are primarily concerned with Iraq, terrorism and jobs.
But wading into the issue was in keeping with the White House's overriding political priority of keeping Bush's base happy and energized, even at the risk of alienating moderate and swing voters who see it as anti-gay.
maneuvering room
It also provided an opportunity for the White House to maneuver Senator John Kerry into a position where it could again accuse him of taking both sides of an issue, the central theme in its effort to portray the challenger as so lacking in conviction that he would be an unreliable leader.
Kerry has said he opposes gay marriage, but he also opposed the amendment, largely on the grounds that the issue was one for states to decide.
In the end, neither Kerry nor his running mate, Senator John Edwards, voted on the issue. But Bush appears to have been more successful in convincing social conservatives that he is steadfastly with them on the issue.
"This is where you see President Bush taking a political risk," said Deal Hudson, an adviser to the White House and the publisher of Crisis, a conservative Roman Catholic magazine.
"I think he knew there would be fallout among the swing voters who respond to the perception of political leaders being moralistic in their stands. Given that he knew that, for him to support the amendment to the degree he has is evidence of his conviction," Hudson said.
Bush won a big round of applause at a campaign rally in Wisconsin last Wednesday speaking of what he called a "debate" in Washington over the subject.
"I believe that a traditional marriage -- marriage between a man and woman -- is an important part of stable families," he said.
In a statement issued by the White House, Bush said he was "deeply disappointed" that the amendment had been "temporarily blocked" in the Senate, and he urged the House to take it up.
appeal to loyalists
Some Republican strategists said the focus on the issue was part of a temporary diversion before the campaign returns to the three defining issues of the election: Iraq, terrorism and the economy.
But other Republican strategists said that in an election that is as likely to be decided by how successful each party is in getting its loyalists to go to the polls on election day as by their appeals to swing voters, gay marriage is proving to be a powerful issue that will not fade.
"To what I would call the moralist portion of the president's base, this issue has become in some ways the new abortion," said Tony Fabrizio, a Republican pollster. "It generates passion."
James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University, said Bush had used the issue skillfully to reassure conservatives without alienating voters in the center.
"It was a classic way to appeal to the conservative values base, knowing full well that it wouldn't pass but that he would still get credit," Thurber said. "He can say it was the first step, and that he is on the side of his base, but he is not making it a major strategy, theme and message of his campaign nationally."
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused