Let's face it, everybody screws up, especially when it comes to politics. But the difference for politicians is that their screw-ups wind up on the front pages of newspapers. The "good" politicians develop an ability to recover from a foul-up. By doing so, even if you screw up, you take responsibility and thereby demonstrate that you are responsible and perhaps smart and politically correct. That's exactly the dilemma Vice President Annette Lu (
As one of the most outspoken political figures in Taiwan, Lu's recent words and deeds illustrated a lack of prudence and comprehension on what role a vice president should play in Taiwan's unique political environment.
Constitutionally speaking, a vice president plays no significant role in the government. But during her first term as vice president, Lu has not only deconstructed the stereotype of the VP as "the one with no voice" but also redefined her role as an active player in the administration.
As a long-time advocate for human and women's rights, Lu is well known for her strong and outspoken personality. Her successful re-election, with a strong endorsement from President Chen Shui-bian (
Nevertheless, her latest inappropriate statements on changing the title of the country, as well as her criticism of the government's disaster relief efforts, created the impression that she is not part of the administration. Even worse are her comments about Aboriginal people. While she put all the blame on local media for misrepresenting her ideas about relocating Aboriginals to Taiwan's allies in Central America and about whether the Aboriginal people indeed are native-born Taiwanese, the problem lies in the timing of such messages.
First, reconstruction after Tropical Storm Mindulle is the administration's top priority. Any discussion of future environmental protection and resource allocation should wait. Although Lu might have her own opinion about reconstruction, no prior consultation was made within the administration's decision-making mechanism before she unleashed her "personal comments" on key issues. The results were inconsistency and an apparent lack of internal discipline from the Chen administration.
Moreover, Lu's attempted political maneuvering over key issues revealed her intention to move to a higher level in 2008 -- at least, that is how her actions were interpreted. While claiming that her latest moves have nothing to do with the election in 2008, Lu's sometimes eccentric performance may constitute a huge liability to her own popularity.
Lu is one of the DPP's leading candidates to become the next president, along with Premier Yu Shyi-kun, Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (
How should Lu recover from her past screw-ups? She must realize that she is a member of the DPP team. And she has to make sure her role is helpful to Chen. Lu should play the same tune as the DPP government, instead of dancing to her own music.
Compared with her predecessors, Lu enjoys more leeway in terms of exercising political influence. Chen assigned her as the head of two advisory boards: the Science and Technology Task Force and the Human Rights Task Force. Lu has rarely been treated as an outsider to Chen's inner circle.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers