No matter what happens in Iraq, and no matter what the US economy does between now and the presidential election, Randy Bernsen will be voting for President George W. Bush. It will be an act of faith.
Religious faith will be at the heart of the presidential election in November. About a quarter of the electorate are white evangelical Protestants, like Bernsen. They represent the most powerful single bloc in US politics, one that is more engaged in the battle this year than at any time since the moral majority brought out the vote for the late president Ronald Reagan.
In fact, the sense of loyalty is even deeper now. Reagan was seen as an ally. In Bush, the evangelicals recognize one of their own. He talks their language. Their defining belief in salvation and redemption is personified in his decision to turn away from alcohol, nearly 20 years ago, and be "born again" in the faith.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Unlike Reagan's secular White House, the Bush White House starts the day with prayers and Bible meetings.
"I pray whoever is leading the country will be led by God, and I believe this current administration answers to a higher calling," said Bernsen, a well-known jazz musician living in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
"I don't wear the man's shoes, but there's enough fruit that falls from that tree to tell me what I need to know. I believe George Bush has surrounded himself with enough of the right people for me to know he is a godly person."
Almost 80 percent of the country's white evangelicals support the president -- a counterweight, in terms of sheer fealty, to African-American backing for the Democrats.
The support for Bush appears to be virtually unanimous among Bernsen's fellow parishioners at the Calvary Chapel in Fort Lauderdale, a "mega-church" that boasts a congregation of more than 17,000.
Calvary's pastor, Bob Coy, has been invited to meetings with Bush and has been impressed.
"I don't think that with this administration we'll be concerning ourselves with a Monica Lewinsky situation," said Pastor Bob, as he is universally known. "He has restored honor to the White House, and that morality is something I will always be proud to carry the banner for."
Pastor Bob's church is a sprawling grey concrete building which still looks like the computer assembly plant it was before it was transformed into a place of worship.
The Calvary Chapel, part of a California-based evangelical "franchise," offers its congregation a complete lifestyle.
Conveniently placed on a major road, the church has a well-equipped school, cafeteria, bookshop and multimedia center that produces music, videos and CDs of sermons that are instantly available after Sunday service. There is a support center for people with cancer and those recently divorced -- even a diving club.
"The bigger we get, the faster it grows," said Rod Pearcy, who runs Calvary's media center. "We are in the age of the superstore, like Home Depot, Lowe's and Super Target. The reason people go to them is there is so much more to offer. It is the same thing with mega-churches."
Protestant mega-churches are spreading exponentially. There are now 850 in the US. They each have congregations of more than 2,000 and a combined total of 3 million.
John Vaughan, whose organization Church Growth Today monitors and encourages their expansion, says a new mega-church appears in the US every four days. Their success, he argues, lies in a simple formula: "inflexible with the word of God, but flexible with their time and space."
The mega-churches are transforming the religious and political map of the US. They are bucking the trend toward secularism, taking evangelism from the declining rural south to the booming suburbs of swing states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, where, as the 2000 election proved, every vote counts.
With that in mind, Bush's meticulous election strategist, Karl Rove, has made the evangelical vote a central plank of his election strategy. His stated target is the 4 million evangelicals who did not vote in 2000, which he blames for the close result.
In the four years since that election, the administration has assiduously courted its Christian base. The president has backed laws banning late-term abortions and restricting stem-cell research, and has declared himself ready to pass a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
But courting the evangelicals has also been about style. Bush regularly uses phrases that strike chords with his fundamentalist audience. In his State of the Union address last year, he spoke of the "wonder-working power" of the the US people, echoing a popular revivalist hymn, There is Power in the Blood.
Asked by Bob Woodward, the Washington journalist, whether he consulted his father, former president George Bush, he replied: "There is a higher father I appeal to."
The Bush campaign is now calling in favors in the battleground states. It has recruited Ralph Reed, formerly a central figure in the Christian Coalition movement, to coordinate its work in the south-east.
It sent a mass e-mail to evangelical pastors in Pennsylvania, asking to use their church halls for party organizing. And, according to the New York Times, it has urged religious volunteers to turn church directories over to the campaign, distribute guides on political issues and persuade their pastors to hold voter registration drives, with deadlines for each task.
Critics of the administration have complained that this new level of politicization violates the separation between church and state, and endangers the tax-exempt status of the churches.
Pastor Bob chafes against such restrictions, arguing that they are seldom raised against black, liberal religious activists such as the Reverend Jesse Jackson.
"I have a church and I'm supposed to have tape over my mouth," he said. "I will go as far as I'm legally allowed to go. We will encourage voter registration ... I can say I'm in favor of a candidate, but I cannot tell people to vote for them."
"The people's voice must be heard and we are the people," he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers