On July 4, Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General James Huang (
Four months have passed since the shooting on the eve of the presidential election, and the investigation team has yet to make a breakthrough. Although he was the incident's victim, Chen has been severely questioned about it by both the opposition and the media. A resolution of the case is crucial for the success of his second term, and his desire for this is easily understandable.
The current inconclusive situation also is unfavorable to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in the year-end legislative elections. The delays in the investigation may become a stick with which the opposition can beat the ruling party, and this could cost the green camp its chance to win a majority in the legislature.
In the face of political deadlock, it is necessary for the ruling party to find a solution. Nevertheless, Chen should not put political necessity ahead of the constitutional system that he has sworn to uphold. The government should accelerate the investigation by pushing it forward responsibly, without neglecting the big picture and the incident's historical implications.
If Chen establishes an independent commission to oversee the investigation, the legal status and the procedures under which it is called into being will come under discussion. The judiciary cannot provide it with "extraordinary temporary powers," and its every action will become a subject of controversy in the run-up to the elections.
As four months have passed, the "golden window of opportunity" for the investigation is long past. For the president to change his original plan regarding the search will not dispel opposition suspicions; neither will it win support from the legal, political and academic establishment. Instead, the government could increase the manpower dedicated to the investigation, or give the team greater legal powers to carry out its tasks, or give it a larger budget or more resources.
If Chen wishes to create an extraordinary commission, even to look into past cases that took place during the martial-law period, then he should do this through legislation. The government and opposition parties should both make some concessions and agree on such legislation so that a commission could be established to investigate past cases.
Another issue that causes concern is the role of the vice president. Even as Chen mulls the direction of the new administration and seeks advice from many quarters, Lu has tended to exaggerate her own importance, not only criticizing the current investigative team but also making announcements on details of the investigation and generally trying to grab the limelight.
Internal troubles within the Presidential Office were one of the main headaches of Chen's first administration. Lu should keep to her role as an assistant to the president, rather than focusing her thoughts on succeeding to the presidency in 2008 and pushing herself forward as though she were already on the campaign trail. After all, having a lot to say doesn't imply that one has understanding, and saying it loudly isn't the same as getting things done. Now that the election is won, Lu should stop behaving as though she were still campaigning.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers