The jury is out on whether democracy will take root in the months after power was trans-ferred from the US-led coalition to an Iraqi administration.
There is a long list of obstacles to be overcome before anything like a sovereign Iraqi state can be said to exist. For the experiment to have any chance of success, this state must take into account the interests of the country's ethnic, religious and political groups in the hope that no group will feel forced to take up armed struggle to secure its ends.
Observers on all sides agree on one point: Arab suicide bombers from the nexus around al-Qaeda have made Iraq an important new field of operations, and their agents have been able to infiltrate the country more effectively since the fall of Saddam Hussein.
These terrorists are incapable of being converted and can only be stopped through accurate intelligence, backed up by force.
Nevertheless, every attempt should be made to court the dissatisfied Iraqis, who have in recent months from their bases in Fallujah, Najaf and Baghdad attacked coalition forces and anyone seen to be backing them.
This is the aim of the International Crisis Group (ICG), which has called on the UN to ensure that even groups that opposed the invasion should be invited to the national conference planned for July.
The ICG, headed by by former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari and former Australian foreign minister Gareth Evans, said in a recent report: "Religious and tribal Sunni leaders as well as followers of Muqtada
al-Sadr, who have felt excluded, will need to be brought in, regardless of their opposition to the occupation."
The conference is seen by the UN as supplementing the transitional government being put in place under US auspices.
Analysts fear that exclusion of these groups from the political process will doom other efforts toward long-term security in Iraq, jeopardizing elections set for January next year.
Al-Sadr has received an invitation to the conference, but whether he will participate remains unclear.
Plans set out in the transitional constitution and backed up by UN Resolution 1546 for the establishment of a new democratically elected Iraqi administration look good on paper, even if the timetable looks ambitious to many.
This provides for elections at the beginning of next year through which a consultative assembly will be chosen to work out the details of a permanent constitution. The last step will be fresh elections at the end of 2005 to choose a new government.
But all this will remain as ideas on paper if the interim government and the foreign troops are unable to put a stop to the assassination of leading politicians, attacks on public buildings and assaults on the emerging Iraqi security forces.
Many Iraqis could simply stay away from the polling stations for fear of being blown up by suicide car bombers as they queue to vote.
Fears of this kind would also mitigate against bringing in enough international observers to monitor the election. Their presence is essential to overcome the mistrust in the electoral process felt by many Iraqis -- a hangover from the days of 99.9 percent results secured by Saddam.
"I don't think that the US and this government will allow free elections," said Baghdad political scientist Wamidh Omar Nadhmi, reflecting the feelings of many Iraqis.
He sees the transfer of power at the end of the month as a facade behind which the US will continue to pull the strings.
European diplomats have noted that power is being transferred only in certain political functions. The transitional government has no right of veto over the military operations of the US-led foreign forces in the country, nor can it order them to undertake military operations.
This would seem to imply that an Iraqi government would not be able to halt US air attacks on Fallujah after it has taken power, but would have to cope with the political fallout of such attacks.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US