At worst, it is reviled, and at best, it is seen as a fudged compromise. The EU Constitution was never likely to please everyone, and so it has proved.
The deal hammered out last Friday at a tumultuous summit of EU leaders bears all the hallmarks of a text put under the near-impossible strain of satisfying the vastly differing interests of 25 nations.
Still, the EU's Irish presidency did well to get a deal at all after the fiasco of a failed December summit.
At one point late in the day, God nearly scuppered accord. Poland and other Roman Catholic nations fought in vain to have a mention of Europe's Christian roots inserted into the Constitution's preamble.
But Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern managed to steer a deft course through a bewildering maze of "red lines," blocking maneuvers and obscure explanatory clauses so that all leaders could come away with a "win-win" solution.
The 333-page end product condenses 80,000 pages of EU laws spread across four treaties into one new one.
It was labeled "historic" on all sides as bleary-eyed EU leaders took to the microphones to start the toughest battle of all -- persuading their nations to ratify the treaty.
Much of the European press reaction was disgruntled at British Prime Minister Tony Blair for pushing through what they called a watered-down treaty.
Blair secured his "red lines" that Britain will not lose its veto over a range of EU policies including taxation, defense and foreign affairs.
"Why did you join the Union if it was only to sabotage it?" the Brussels newspaper La Libre Belgique demanded to know, angry also at Blair for rejecting Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhof-stadt as the next chief of the EU executive.
For its part, the euroskeptic British press reprised its charge that the Constitution amounted to a "blueprint for tyranny" by Brussels and predicted Blair would never win the referendum he has promised to the British people.
But for Julie Smith of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, "the real winner is Mr Fudge."
"A lot of decisions seem to have been pushed over and rolled back," she said.
The leaders agreed to limit the size of the European Commission to 18 members -- but only from 2014, and then only if member states don't unanimously agree in the interim to change their minds.
The smallest member states such as Malta and Luxembourg are guaranteed a minimum of six seats each in the European Parliament, which will see a doubling of its powers to co-legislate with the member states.
On the most vexed issue of all, the constitution settled on a new "double majority" system to decide EU laws. Legislation will need the approval of 15 of the member states, representing at least 65 percent of the bloc's population.
Crucially, it also sets out that a minimum of four countries is needed to form a "blocking minority" -- effectively ensuring that EU heavyweights Britain, France and Germany cannot themselves throw out a piece of legislation.
"It could be quite significant in stalling legislation. Four member states isn't actually very many to block legislation," Smith commented.
More positively, the Constitution will give the EU a "president" elected by its member states to guide its work. That should give continuity to policy-making by replacing the current six-month rotating presidency.
But ministerial councils will be divided up among three countries for 18 months, ensuring everyone gets a crack of the whip.
The 12 euro nations will get more formal powers of decision-making on issues related to Europe's common currency.
The range of majority, as opposed to unanimous, voting is extended to 30 new areas, including asylum, immigration and aspects of criminal law.
But Britain secured an "emergency brake" to ensure sensitive items of legislation that do not require unanimous votes must be reconsidered if a country so demands.
The EU will also get a "foreign minister," almost certainly to be EU foreign affairs "high representative" Javier Solana, to strut the world stage and oversee a fledgling EU diplomatic service.
The Constitution's drafters had hoped the text would emulate the ringing tones of the American Declaration of Independence. It stops some way short of that.
"It's not a very readable document and it's been made worse by the summit, but it's still better than the previous treaties," commented Kirsty Hughes of the London School of Economics.
"Everything's been brought together and it does try hard to explain what the EU is about. Overall it's a step in the right direction for democracy and efficiency."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95