No prizes for predicting that apathy and ignorance will ensure yet another record low turnout in this week's European elections -- just at the moment when 350 million people across the continent are eligible to vote. And that's not only in the veteran EU member states but, alarmingly, also in several of the eastern newcomers.
Portuguese punters are keener on watching Zidane and Beckham play in the Euro 2004 championship than sending members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to Strasbourg and Brussels. Some eye-catching celebrities are standing, but Slovaks are unlikely to exceed the forecast 26 percent participation because their national hockey champ is a candidate. Ditto for Estonians drawn by the charms of supermodel Carmen Kass.
Robert Kilroy-Silk, star turn of the UK Independence party, will certainly have novelty value if he leads a dozen true Brits into the heart of euro-darkness -- and teams up with a motley crew of Danes, Dutchmen and rabidly anti-EU Poles to form a significant new sceptic block.
That might not be a bad thing. The European parliament is so deeply unloved and so remote that it welcomes almost any publicity, however embarrassing. That much was clear last summer when Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi cracked his side-splitting Nazi camp guard gag about an appalled German deputy. The reverberations seemed to flatter an institution that is routinely dismissed as a talking shop on a gravy train, a travelling circus lubricated by dubious expenses claims. Even bad jokes, lost in translation, are better than no jokes.
Parliament, of course, is far more than a talking shop, and its already extensive powers of "co-decision" with the European commission and national governments will expand further under the new EU constitution. The expected center-right majority expects member states to take its views into account when choosing a replacement for Romano Prodi, the commission president, though they missed a trick for giving some democratic substance to the elections by failing to put forward their own candidates.
Lobbyists scrutinizing the small print of waste recycling rules or takeover directives recognize the importance of MEPs even if their constituents have never heard of them. But nothing can compensate for the absence of that elusive creature, a European demos -- with familiar characters, knockabout debate, and a path from the back benches of the legislature up the greasy pole of executive power. Only the Greens operate at European rather than national level. And the only parties fighting on specifically European issues are the the UK Independence party and other populists desperate to leave the union.
Wishful thinkers seeking comfort in the grim times since Sept. 11 argue that mass protests over Iraq suggest the emergence of a genuine pan-European public opinion. Opposition to the war is certainly a significant factor in the elections. The problem is that since parliament does not have -- and is never likely to have -- powers over foreign policy, defense and other core areas of national sovereignty, there is no way of translating it into change at continental level.
Nor does it have any direct control over the most fateful question facing the EU: whether a reforming Turkey has met the democratic and human rights criteria to be given a date to start membership talks. But a confident parliament should be able to influence the outcome as the commission and governments -- some showing signs of back-pedalling -- ponder their decision.
The UK rightly wants to say yes to a model Muslim democracy. That would be a resounding and optimistic European retort to self-fulfilling warnings of an inevitable "clash of civilizations." MEPs should be speaking out, loud and clear, on this. It's not something anyone can afford to be apathetic about.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US