Reform yourself first
Your perspicacious editorial ("A dirty pot taunts a clean kettle," May 26, page 8) impressed me. In Taiwan, our party leaders, legislators and government officials declare all the time: "The people are the government's foreman," but what they frequently demonstrate is quite the opposite. That's why they are always condemned for being ineffective.
It seems to me that they have been given such great power that they become unethical in handling political affairs. Confucius even stated: "To govern means to rectify. If you were to lead the people with correctness, who would not be rectified?" (
Alice Tsai
Taipei
KMT, retake the mainland!
What do the recent debate about Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) reform and China's threats to Taiwan have in common? ("China is blind to Taiwanese people," May 30, page 8) Both are blind to the Taiwanese people.
Perhaps for the KMT's ultimate reform, it could declare, "We will defend Taiwan's freedom and democracy at any cost," since "at any cost" appears to be the catch phrase for Chinese intimidation of Taiwan. Although we don't know exactly what cost China is thinking about, we certainly know this cost does not have to be approved by the Chinese people.
The KMT has long dominated both military leadership and military personnel in Taiwan. Such a declaration would be credible and appreciated by Taiwanese. It would be consistent with the KMT's founding principles. It is also one thing they are in a position to do better than the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
If one asks what is the least likely cost the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is willing to pay for attacking Taiwan? One would have to conclude that it is their monopoly power to rule China. "Retaking the mainland" is not an impossibility, if one thinks more carefully and has a little more imagination. What if Taiwan, (with a little help from the US) concentrates its fire power to eliminate the CCP ruling class if Taiwan is attacked? Is it not possible that a public uprising would ensue to demand democracy in China?
Who knows? The KMT may even return to the "mainland," at a very least becoming a legitimate party to compete for the votes of Chinese voters, this time as a liberator. The KMT might even win power again.
To either make China think twice about using force or to actually prepare for such a strategy requires the KMT's cooperation. This will absolutely benefit peace between Taiwan and China.
KMT reformers, set your sights a little higher, a little farther! But you can win no power without the trust of the people -- either in Taiwan or in China.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past