The Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China published by the US Department of Defense on May 28 expresses worries that China's goal of modernizing its military is making it more likely that China will take armed action against Taiwan.
The US' worries are not unfounded. Many of the attendees at a People's Liberation Army (PLA) symposium I attended in Nanjing in April this year said that "a war in the Taiwan Strait will eventually be required," and the attitude of Military Commission Chairman Jiang Zemin (
The question is if China could be certain of victory were it to start a war. The answer, I'm afraid, is unknown.
Many people in the PLA believe it would be impossible to restrict the extent of a potential war in the Taiwan Strait. They think a war would be certain to involve changes in the military situation in both the northeast and the northwest of China. They worry in particular that North Korea would stir things up in the northeast, and that separatists in the northwest would seize on the opportunity to create disturbances.
Military action in the Taiwan Strait would thus affect the overall regional balance of power, so if the PLA sets things in motion in the Taiwan Strait, all China would be immedi-ately thrown into a difficult situation.
In such a situation, the PLA might have to fight three kinds of war simultaneously: a high-tech war in the Taiwan Strait involving every branch of the military; a traditional war involving army and air force in the northeast; and a special forces war to stop terrorist attacks in the northwest. The PLA is clearly not able to handle three different kinds of war simultaneously.
If in the Taiwan Strait the PLA chose to adopt a decapitation strategy and begin an attack using missiles, it would face an immediate counterattack from Taiwan's army and the US' Pacific forces.
If the PLA then sent its fleet to attack Taiwan, it would be met by Taiwanese, US and Japanese missiles. In other words, the Chinese fleet might be sunk before even landing on Taiwan. The PLA might thus be forced to retreat even without the US and Japan having to send any troops.
If the PLA simply defined a war in the Taiwan Strait as a punitive expedition against Taiwan, Taiwan would of course declare independence in the event of an attack. China would thus have to retreat without achieving its objective, while Taiwan's independence would become a reality.
During the fighting, other countries might also recognize an independent Taiwan, and that is of course an outcome China does not want to see.
A war in the Taiwan Strait may upset China's internal and external security, particularly regarding US and Japanese attitudes toward a war.
As the US expressed satisfaction President Chen Shui-bian's (
That is not only unrealistic, but may also be the worst choice for China.
Wang Kun-yi is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies of Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers