May 12 was the day for Premier Yu Shyi-kun's Cabinet to resign.
With luck, it will also turn out to mark the beginnings
of clear and definite political accountability.
During his first term in
office, President Chen Shui-bian (
Therefore, he first built a"government for all the people" and appointed upstanding members of society in key positions while stressing
bipartisan cooperation.
But the government's performance was a disappointment, with both former premier Tang Fei (
Obviously, an administration departing from the normal course of party politics and seeking an alliance with the social elite did not work.
This time, after the Cabinet reshuffle, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has become a "genuine" pan-green regime.
DPP members have taken most of the important posts, while recruitments from professional society -- such
as Lin Hsin-i (
premier and the chairman of the Cabinet's Council for Economic Planning and Development -- have left their posts. The DPP has now gained complete control of the government's executive branch.
Opportunities
On the one hand, this provides opportunities for the pan-green camp to cultivate talent, as many party members in their 30s or 40s have been appointed Cabinet members.
On the other hand, this is the beginning of complete political accountability. The DPP government has to return to the principle of ruling the nation with honesty and credibility, and turn its campaign promises into policies, so as to become a mature regime.
At the same time, the establishment of a pan-green Cabinet is helpful in normalizing party politics.
Thus, politics will be transformed into a specialized profession, where social elites and intellectuals may not come and go as they wish, as they once did.
A party is not only a campaign machine aimed at gaining power but also an apparatus for cultivating political talent. Changings of the guard within a party are necessary if a party wants to maintain power in the long term.
Partisanship
This is a goal toward which the pan-green camp has worked hard, and is also an area that
is developing into a crisis for
the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Therefore, partisanship in a ruling party is a good thing: It allows voters to clearly predict changes in policy that might be brought about by a change in power. This enables voters to make objective comparisons and rational decisions.
Moreover, it is desirable for politicians to have a clearly distinguishable party affiliation and ideology so that there will be no room for them to resort to political opportunism. They must uphold their ideals and try to enter the talent pool of their parties in order to have a chance to get involved in political affairs.
That being the case, politicians with an identifiable party affiliation and ideology will have less room for opportunism than will neutral members of society.
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant research fellow at the Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers