More than a month after the presidential election, We are still mired in controversy. The dispute over the victory is to be settled via legal channels. After US forensics specialist Henry Lee's (
It is time for both the government and the opposition to make concessions and hand the reins to the judicial authorities. If the green and blue camps hope to build and safeguard democracy, they should use the law as a yardstick to meas-ure their behavior. It is improper to resort to rash speculation and assumptions, stepping beyond the bounds of democracy and law.
For both sides' politicians, such plain logic is easy to understand but hard to act upon.
On April 13 in the Taipei City Council chambers, some council members placed a shrine in front of the portrait of Chen and burned incense, then tore the portrait down and carried it around. In the Legislative Yuan, a legislator said that "people should kill Chen Shui-bian" -- then atoned for the misstep with three apologies and six bows.
This sort of behavior violates the status and accountability of elected representatives, falls short of the people's trust and damages democracy and the rule of law. I believe these politicians are staging a political show to attract media attention. Yet politicians who put aside public issues to engage in political stunts are little different from drunkards hit by the stones they throw at others.
I fear that such drunkards, unaware of their own inebriation, will blame other people if the wine is bad. Such irresponsible behavior incites supporters of different camps and escalates social tensions, igniting more hatred between the opposing sides. While the green camp talked about gaining votes through a "cutthroat" war, the blue camp issued un-nerving calls to "gun down" their opponents.
This political discourse is plagued with hyperbole, forcing democracy to yield to savage antagonism. As the doors to beneficial interparty interactions shut, the public forum is transformed into a slaughterhouse. Of course, the victims are the supporters of both camps and those who must earn a living regardless of their ethnicity.
Politicians' careers rely on their political discourse, and their electoral support measures the effects of this discourse. Accountable politicians understand the responsibilities entrusted to them by the electorate and know they must be cautious with their words and deeds.
But this is not the case with manipulative politicians, who cover hatred with love, paper over violence with peace, costume authoritarianism as democracy, and coat political strife with ethnic issues. As a result, the supporters of the green and the blue camps who once sat together and shared their thoughts now point fingers at each other.
Sadly, the costs of politicizing ethnic issues go beyond this lack of collegiality. As Taiwan has inherited undeniable political and economic divisions from the past, it also has subtle and complicated ethnic problems.
Nonetheless, it is overstatement to call this "ethnic conflict." Supporters of both the Chen-Lu ticket and the joint ticket of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) include four major ethnic groups.
And while the numbers of Chen-Lu supporters among Mainlander, Hakka and Aboriginal groups surged, the number of Lien-Soong supporters among the Hoklo (also known as local Taiwanese) exceeded 40 percent.
These diverse loyalties reveal that voters are more level-headed than politicians: they vote for candidates instead of parties. They care more about which leader offers a hopeful tomorrow than about ethnic ideologies. If there were ethnic conflict in Taiwan, Chen and Lu might not have won such a narrow victory. The problem is not who disrupts ethnic harmony, but rather that both camps are politicizing ethnic issues.
Consequently, even the identity-building slogan "Love Taiwan" becomes a scapegoat, sparking a further fierce war of words. Love for Taiwan, like love for our society, nation, democracy, justice and peace, hinges on issues of identification. Since everyone loves Taiwan, how can this slogan incite ethnic conflict?
Those candidates who chanted the "Love Taiwan" slogan might benefit from their enhanced political image, but they do not necessarily win more votes. The voters will judge politicians by their actions rather than by their words. Ethnic conflicts and biases are beside the point.
Politicians from both camps should take note of this, and stop hyping the ethnic issue.
Xiang Yang is an associate professor of indigenous languages at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past