Around the time of the presidential election, members of the international media congregated in Taiwan, and their dispatches made headline news on international news channels such as CNN and the BBC. This displayed Taiwan's democratic situation for the whole world to see, warts and all.
TV cameras want blood, and journalists always look for the most exciting angle, so riot police were frequently seen. The night scenery on Ketagalan Boulevard against the backdrop of a line of shields warding off protesters in front of the Presidential Office offers a further associative framework. Close physical encounters in front of close-up cameras showing people being dragged or carried away leave Taiwan's young and inexperienced democracy lying naked on a stretcher.
In contrast to visual media, words leave room for reasoning. Chinese-language publications sometimes include articles exploring the presidential election, the ensuing developments within the political parties, the generational change and ethnic relations from the perspective of deepening democracy. Foreign English-language media also provide intermittent objective appraisals of democracy in Taiwan. The South China Morning Post, for example, wrote March 30 that "Fortunately, law and order has been maintained even as the controversy drags on. This speaks volumes about the maturity of Taiwanese society and the restraint of the citizen."
There was no obvious electoral fraud, according to "Twisting the logic of democracy," by Joseph Chang (
In other words, Taiwan should not underestimate itself. Although all this took place in the open for everyone to see, a little extra effort will make everyone aware of Taiwan's resilience, which in fact also is the resilience of democracy.
Democracy provides society with a mechanism for learning. It allows the public to understand standards and change past behavior through practical implementation.
Because this is a social conflict that everyone is following intently, people have learned why, when two parties are involved in a conflict and neither party wants to stand down, it is the judiciary that best calms the two parties down -- intense emotions will be cooled when handled with logical language as courts, transparently and openly, find concrete, feasible solutions.
During the first hearing before a full court, Judge Wu Ching-yuan (
The political quarrel is no more than just that: a quarrel. Emotional language does not help to resolve issues when an independent judiciary issues a public decision that both parties respect and abide by.
I feel that Taiwan has been wronged. With the emotional scenes of the past weeks still fresh in our minds, the aspects of reason in the follow-up have not caught the attention of foreign media. I am not afraid of continued attention, but rather that foreign media will lose interest in Taiwan. As long as they maintain their interest, they will see the progressing learning experience in Taiwanese society, including the self-adjusting democratic system and the continued mediation of all issues within the legal system.
Ping Lu is an author.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US