Bordering on insanity
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) scored a new low in politics by issuing a poster comparing President Chen Shui-bian (
To my even greater disbelief, the KMT's Taichung City campaign headquarters actually endorsed it. And to think Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (
It's not only an insult to Chen and his administration, but also to freedom-loving Taiwanese, Americans and Iraqis that the KMT would use these tyrannical figures for its political gain. The KMT may be an old and wealthy political party, but it's certainly acting like a child in this case.
Eugene Liu
Atlanta, Georgia
Every ballot has meaning
In the wake of a very close election result, there will be a temptation for both political camps to utilize spoiled ballots to recover a loss or consolidate a win. Neither should be allowed.
There are two kinds of spoiled ballots: unintentional and intentional. How ballots were unintentionally spoiled may be further divided into two types: through incompetence or carelessness.
Incompetently spoiled ballots are a result of not being able to understand or follow voting rules. The rules are not difficult: one, use the stamp provided; two, stay within the box provided. The box within which one places the stamp is many times larger than the stamp, so this task should be easy, even if one's dexterity is poor. One hopes that there were services available to allow those who are physically infirm to make it to a polling station and cast their ballots.
This standard does not appear difficult to meet and was agreed upon by all parties prior to the election. And assuming this country has no more than its fair share of mentally challenged voters, the percentage of spoiled ballots due to incompetence should be very small.
It is possible that the number of carelessly spoiled ballots is larger. These are produced by voters who are able to understand and remember the rules but believe they are not worth their trouble. They believe the rules are mere guidelines which do not necessarily apply to them, or that the voting process in particular is not worthy of their full attention. Should the votes of those with such little regard for the democratic process be counted? Hopefully, these only represent a small minority of spoiled ballots.
There is, however, an important category of intentionally spoiled ballots we should consider: the protest vote.
The voter casts a protest vote to show that he or she does want to participate in the democratic process but does not support any of the main candidates. Often, the protest vote is given to another candidate with almost no chance of winning. But this time, with only two high-profile camps fielding candidates, the only way to cast a protest vote was to cast a spoiled ballot.
Every eligible voter has the right to vote or not and the freedom to spoil their ballot or not. Give every voter credit for having the intelligence and the interest necessary to participate in the democratic process, and do not allow any political party to usurp the voter's right to be heard under the pretext of clarifying an election result.
Lin Yu-tang
Taipei
In from the cold
I feel sorry for the protesters sitting in such drizzly and cold weather in front of the Presidential Office. My father is a retired policeman who urged us to vote for the KMT in the 2000 presidential election, which we all did. At the time, former president Lee Teng-hui (
But what a stark contrast he is compared with present KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Yes, we agreed with what Lien proposed for the nation -- truth, freedom and democracy. However, he forgot something more urgent and more pressing: we, as humble citizens, want stability. If the country is threatened with civil turmoil, then truth, freedom and democracy can be enjoyed by nobody.
I implore Lien and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to tell us how they can find peace in their hearts at night, sleeping in their comfortable beds, while those poor protesters are still sitting out there in the cold. Does this lead us to think that they want to bring happiness to Taiwanese people? Does it lead us to believe that they would bring stability to this already unstable society?
May Huang
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers