Germany's Social Democrats (SPD) have scented blood. Now that Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has ceded power for the first time in his career by quitting as their leader, they want a leftward shift that will slow his reforms.
Schroeder, looking tired
and subdued since his surprise announcement last Friday, has no option but to listen.
He saved his government by handing the chairmanship of his restless, demoralized center-left SPD to a trusted and far more popular ally, Franz Muentefering, amid growing grassroots fury over his welfare cuts.
But now he has a boss. It is
a humiliating blow for the man who stood up to Washington over Iraq, achieved the near impossible by winning re-election in 2002 and gained parliamentary approval for landmark reforms in December.
Since last month a public outcry over higher doctors' fees and planned pension cuts, part of his "Agenda 2010" program, has proved too much for the SPD, which reluctantly backed the reforms it saw as hurting the man in the street.
"It's like on the Bounty," prominent SPD leftwinger Andrea Nahles said. "The party is close to mutiny."
For the moment, the SPD has been pacified by the appointment of a chairman it identifies with more closely than Schroeder.
Thomas Mayer, chief European economist at Deutsche Bank, said: "The party is not following Schroeder the way he had hoped a year ago. He won't reverse his reforms, but he'll have to adjust them and slow them down."
"He will have to make concessions to the left wing," he said.
The wrangling shows how difficult it is for Europe's largest economy to return to growth and adapt its welfare system to the rising cost of an aging population. France and Italy face similar challenges.
NEW TAXES, CABINET RESHUFFLE
Concessions are likely to include forcing companies to pay a "training tax" if they refuse to offer apprenticeships. Another measure may be to raise inheritance tax or introduce a wealth tax to ensure "little people" do not bear the brunt of reforms.
SPD officials are urging the government to start showing more "social justice." Whether Schroeder has the stomach for more health and pension reforms before the 2006 election is in doubt.
Speculation is also mounting that Schroeder cannot long resist calls for a Cabinet reshuffle to get rid of unpopular ministers including Finance Minister Hans Eichel.
Muentefering, a former metalworker who wears a red scarf to underscore his Socialist roots, is popular in the SPD even though he backed Schroeder's Agenda 2010.
He has said the reforms agreed so far would not be reversed. But he added the government would proceed more cautiously on reforms after failing to persuade the public of their necessity.
SCHROEDER'S FUTURE IN DOUBT
Schroeder wants Muentefering to act as a buffer between him and the party, to massage its troubled Socialist soul and persuade it of the need for reform.
That could give Schroeder breathing space, but his survival depends on how the SPD performs in a string of elections -- and on the economy, experiencing a mild, jobless recovery that is not being felt by ordinary people. New health charges and pension cuts are set to squeeze incomes.
Landslide state election defeats last year, the prospect of further routs this year and the worst opinion poll ratings on record -- around 25 percent -- have tarnished Schroeder's image as a vote-winner, his main hold on the party.
Analysts said he may not survive until the 2006 general election if he loses the 14 state, local and European elections this year, starting with a vote
in Hamburg on Feb. 29.
A state election defeat in the SPD's heartland of North Rhine-Westphalia in 2005 could bring him down, said Gero Neugebauer, political scientist at Berlin's Free University.
He could go sooner.
Schroeder, prone to impulsive actions, forced his SPD to back his reform agenda last year by threatening repeatedly to resign.
At the time, such threats had an impact. Now, with SPD members abandoning the party in thousands, it may be welcomed.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US