A Zen master who has long resided in the US recently came back to Taiwan to give Buddhist teachings.
He mentioned the relationship between politics and religion in one of his many lectures. He felt that the social tensions represented by the split between the pan-blue and pan-green camps is almost as serious as the racial conflict between black and white people in US history or the strife between Islam and Hinduism in India.
He thinks we need someone like Gandhi to mediate and sacrifice himself or herself if we are to have any hope for reconciliation.
I asked him: If a religious master deliberately obscures his political stance so as to reduce resistance and facilitate his teachings in the community, how is he different from a businessman who avoids taking sides to make more money?
The Zen master did not answer the question about motives directly. Instead, he said that our society needs an impartial third party who reminds the parties to calm down and listen to each other humbly. The third party should play the role of an arbitrator, so neutrality should be strictly observed. But this would not affect the religious master's own voting preferences. The master believes this to be true neutrality.
I think this Zen master is very experienced and thoroughly understands both Buddhist teachings and the ways of the world. He is concerned with politics but he is seldom involved in it. He does not casually talk about controversial political issues. He is good at maintaining his neutrality.
Master Wei Chueh (
In other words, not all religious masters have the virtuous capacity to act as an impartial third party.
To win more votes, some political figures purposefully obscure their political positions by proposing reconciliation and forgiveness. But in reality they still want to defeat and tear their enemies to pieces when the time is ripe. This is false neutrality.
Today's division between the pan-blue camp's pro-China stance and pan-green camp's emphasis on Taiwan's sovereignty is a result of various historical factors and social criteria. The two camp's different views represent two options for the country's future.
Some people believe that scholars should observe neutrality, but this is also incorrect. Only a few academics with extraordinary virtue, such as Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (
Most scholars are average citizens. They should strongly defend the values and positions they choose. As long as they focus on the matter at hand and listen to others, they have absorbed the essence of being neutral.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Modern History at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Jennie Shih
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth