Following the release of a Chinese policy paper on direct cross-strait links, China's civil aviation administration has launched a push for direct links, spearheaded by its Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office.
The push echoes the campaign platform of the Lien-Soong clique, which has promised direct transportation links within a year or two if elected.
As for the businesspeople of Taiwan, whose primary concerns are economics and transportation, a sugar-coated direct-links offensive from China that does not involve "one China" can better win their sympathy and votes than can the "one-way" and "indirect" transportation links of President Chen Shui-bian's (
From the perspective of protecting Taiwan, the A-bian (
We cannot ignore national security simply to curry favor with Taiwanese businesses.
When it comes to defining flight routes, China favors the term "cross-strait routes."
Negotiations are conducted in the private sector, between professional associations or companies; China views the Taiwanese government as it views Hong Kong and Macau -- as special administrative regions -- ignoring Taiwan's sovereignty. Taiwan cannot accept this.
China has made it clear that the negotiations will not touch "one China." In fact, giving up on government-to-government talks will reinforce the "one China principle" -- the claim that Taiwan is a part of China.
If direct links are agreed to through negotiations under the ground rules, Taiwan will have given up its sovereignty and national defense. Taiwan's military will not be able to intervene in cross-strait traffic. It will be no different from opening up air and sea territories to the enemy.
At 11pm on Aug. 20, 1968, a Soviet civilian aircraft complained of a malfunction while flying over Prague and made a forced landing at Ruzyme airport, 15km away from the city center. After the landing, the aircraft did not stop on the runway or evacuate its passengers. Instead, it taxied at high speed and crashed into the apron of the terminal building. Armed members of the Soviet 103rd Guards Desant Division poured out of the plane. Within a few minutes they had captured the flight control tower. The airport guards became prisoners before they could respond.
Air control personnel from the rapid attack force directed Soviet transport planes, which had been circling in the sky, to land at the rate of a plane per minute.
Once Taipei City's Sungshan Airport is used for cross-strait flights, the scenario described above could happen in Taiwan.
Military transport planes using civilian flights as cover in the first wave of attack can evade radar and prevent early responses from anti-aircraft fire.
In addition, ground control personnel cannot be sure what passenger planes are carrying. Air force fighters and anti-aircraft missile units dare not make assumptions or shoot down the planes. Troops guarding the airport cannot use their weapons.
If direct flights are to come about, Taiwan must insist on "curved-line direct links" that fly through air space whose traffic is controlled by a third country.
Taiwanese businesspeople must remember that Taiwan is their motherland. Once sovereignty is lost or Taiwan becomes a part of China, Taiwanese businesses in China will no longer be a rare commodity.
Huang Yao-ming is a member of the board of directors of the Coconut Tree Foundation.
Translated by Francis Huang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past