The pan-blue camp has made efforts to explain its cross-strait policy over the past few days, but the ambiguities and contradictions in their position have not eased the public's suspicions. In the past such ambiguity has been used to maintain stability and the status quo, which appealed to moderate voters. However, considering the changing international scene and changing views of moderate voters, the question is: Has this strategy of ambiguity become outdated?
A quick survey of the top five pan-blue figures' public statements reveals at least five different views on cross-strait issues. On Wednesday, at a press conference held to give Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
With advanced degrees in political science, Lien of course knows that there is a fundamental problem with his view. Internationally -- just as the People's Republic of China is the name of the government representing China -- the ROC is supposed to be the name of a government. The only question is which country.
This was of course disappointing, since only a day earlier, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Neither Lien nor Soong explained how their latest statements on cross-strait policy fit in with Soong's prior statement that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are both under a "one China roof," and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
To worsen the confusion, Lien then said that if he is elected, Taiwan will immediately start a dialogue with China about direct links. How can that be done when China insists that such dialogues can only be conducted if Taiwan accepts the "one China" principle?
The pan-blues must realize that moderate voters -- the group to which they are obviously trying to appeal -- are not permanently stagnant. Their views are evolving with the emergence of new values and greater demands for rights and freedoms in Taiwanese society. A case in point is the referendum right, which only a few years ago was still just a proposal by radical independence advocates, but which has now become commonly accepted.
Finally, it is also imperative to realize that, in the past, when China was not nearly the economic and military power it is today, Taiwan might have been able to prosper in the international community with its ambiguous status. But as China gains more power against Taiwan, Taiwan has less room to breathe. Can we continue to delude ourselves that the status quo can be maintained by such an ambiguous cross-strait policy?
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past