US' origins like Taiwan's
Should Washington propose, as seems more and more likely, a policy of outright opposition to Taiwanese independence and any perceived or real moves in that direction (such as referendums), perhaps it should first consider how the United States came into being.
The US as a concept relies heavily on the history of the country's foundation by groups of British and Irish citizens, who fled a land where they opposed the existing regime and faced persecution, and built a new nation for themselves across the waters, which through economic expansion and democratic principles they made their own, and in which they eventually came to live in harmony alongside the native peoples of that land.
Hasn't the modern Taiwanese nation, if we decide to radically simplify a very complex history, come about in the same way?
If only the irony of these two countries' strikingly similar backgrounds were to reach the American consciousness, would the American people themselves oppose any democratic move toward independence? No. Would they empathize? Yes.
The US administration has, in the case of Taiwan, prioritized its own unstable, unpredictable, and now more than ever invaluable relationship with the Chinese government. This relationship is understandably important to them not only in terms of trade, but with regards to the US' position in Iraq and in the North Korean talks. But in doing so it is forgetting all the principles on which its own freedom was built.
To the Taiwanese government and media: Feel free to make the position of your people and their right to direct democracy known to the world. Educate the international public and then sit back and watch the kind of democracy you crave work its magic as citizens of the US fight against their government's policy of bowing down to China.
Charlotte Foster
Taipei
Japan shifting Taiwan policy
For the first time in a few years China has issued a warning about possible military action if Taiwan were to declare independence.
More significantly, however, according to some analysts Japan is in the middle of a review of its Taiwan policy. In certain quarters it is being said that the policy of appeasing China is yielding no real results and that, since China is an emerging superpower in the region, they had better play the Taiwan card more strongly.
They have also criticized Japan's (in their view) semi-tributary policies toward China on the Taiwan issue. This will no doubt arouse China's attention and possibly its displeasure, even as the Japanese cut back their aid to China.
Japanese aid has in the past sometimes served as leverage over China, and lowering the level of aid could mean an increased possibility that China would start making decisions without being as concerned about Japan's interests as they are now.
This also comes at a bad time for China-Japan trade relations. China is threatening to slap tariffs on Japan, the US and South Korea for imposing quotas on their textiles exports and, from the US, steel exports. Economics and political agendas are crossing swords at an awkward moment.
Tai Wei Lim
Singapore
Curing the chaos
Politically Taiwan is in chaos. The ongoing irrational confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps has resulted in gridlock in the Legislative Yuan. Taiwan's people are the victims.
If the confrontation cannot be resolved in the next election, predictably, no matter which camp wins or who is elected president, the chaos will be there to bring Taiwanese four more years of nightmare.
To cure the chaos in Taiwan, the confrontation has to be ridden out and replaced by reconciliation and competition. Since the confrontation resulted from the difference of ideology regarding Taiwan's national identity, the issue has to be resolved in the next election, so that Taiwan's next president will not suffer an outrageous boycott from its opposition party.
This would allow Taiwanese to live with more ease and hope over the next four years.
Luckily the controversial "birdcage referendum" law provides a possible solution to end all this confrontation and nightmare for the Taiwanese.
That is provision 17, as pointed out by President Chen Shui-bian (
Provision 17 is defensive, not offensive. Taiwanese can no longer escape their responsibility and hope society will be peaceful and stable or that the problem will go away by itself.
The real judge is the people of Taiwan. They are the master of their own fate, not the parties, China or the US.
The world is watching. If the Taiwanese cannot even vote for a defensive referendum due to China's threats, then they are betraying themselves and might as well prepare to live with the consequences: They might as well put on the shackles and kowtow to China.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95