US' origins like Taiwan's
Should Washington propose, as seems more and more likely, a policy of outright opposition to Taiwanese independence and any perceived or real moves in that direction (such as referendums), perhaps it should first consider how the United States came into being.
The US as a concept relies heavily on the history of the country's foundation by groups of British and Irish citizens, who fled a land where they opposed the existing regime and faced persecution, and built a new nation for themselves across the waters, which through economic expansion and democratic principles they made their own, and in which they eventually came to live in harmony alongside the native peoples of that land.
Hasn't the modern Taiwanese nation, if we decide to radically simplify a very complex history, come about in the same way?
If only the irony of these two countries' strikingly similar backgrounds were to reach the American consciousness, would the American people themselves oppose any democratic move toward independence? No. Would they empathize? Yes.
The US administration has, in the case of Taiwan, prioritized its own unstable, unpredictable, and now more than ever invaluable relationship with the Chinese government. This relationship is understandably important to them not only in terms of trade, but with regards to the US' position in Iraq and in the North Korean talks. But in doing so it is forgetting all the principles on which its own freedom was built.
To the Taiwanese government and media: Feel free to make the position of your people and their right to direct democracy known to the world. Educate the international public and then sit back and watch the kind of democracy you crave work its magic as citizens of the US fight against their government's policy of bowing down to China.
Charlotte Foster
Taipei
Japan shifting Taiwan policy
For the first time in a few years China has issued a warning about possible military action if Taiwan were to declare independence.
More significantly, however, according to some analysts Japan is in the middle of a review of its Taiwan policy. In certain quarters it is being said that the policy of appeasing China is yielding no real results and that, since China is an emerging superpower in the region, they had better play the Taiwan card more strongly.
They have also criticized Japan's (in their view) semi-tributary policies toward China on the Taiwan issue. This will no doubt arouse China's attention and possibly its displeasure, even as the Japanese cut back their aid to China.
Japanese aid has in the past sometimes served as leverage over China, and lowering the level of aid could mean an increased possibility that China would start making decisions without being as concerned about Japan's interests as they are now.
This also comes at a bad time for China-Japan trade relations. China is threatening to slap tariffs on Japan, the US and South Korea for imposing quotas on their textiles exports and, from the US, steel exports. Economics and political agendas are crossing swords at an awkward moment.
Tai Wei Lim
Singapore
Curing the chaos
Politically Taiwan is in chaos. The ongoing irrational confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps has resulted in gridlock in the Legislative Yuan. Taiwan's people are the victims.
If the confrontation cannot be resolved in the next election, predictably, no matter which camp wins or who is elected president, the chaos will be there to bring Taiwanese four more years of nightmare.
To cure the chaos in Taiwan, the confrontation has to be ridden out and replaced by reconciliation and competition. Since the confrontation resulted from the difference of ideology regarding Taiwan's national identity, the issue has to be resolved in the next election, so that Taiwan's next president will not suffer an outrageous boycott from its opposition party.
This would allow Taiwanese to live with more ease and hope over the next four years.
Luckily the controversial "birdcage referendum" law provides a possible solution to end all this confrontation and nightmare for the Taiwanese.
That is provision 17, as pointed out by President Chen Shui-bian (
Provision 17 is defensive, not offensive. Taiwanese can no longer escape their responsibility and hope society will be peaceful and stable or that the problem will go away by itself.
The real judge is the people of Taiwan. They are the master of their own fate, not the parties, China or the US.
The world is watching. If the Taiwanese cannot even vote for a defensive referendum due to China's threats, then they are betraying themselves and might as well prepare to live with the consequences: They might as well put on the shackles and kowtow to China.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US