On Nov. 17, Wang Zaixi (王在希), vice minister of the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, said that Taiwan's push for independence has crossed China's line in the sand and risks war. Wang Daohan (汪道涵), chairman of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, also publicly criticized Taiwan's move.
This is the first time that high-ranking Chinese officials have denounced President Chen Shui-bian's (
Many people are of the opinion that Beijing will not repeat what it did in 1996, so as to avoid helping Chen secure his re-election. This reasoning is based on the facts that China's missile tests in 1996 led to a landslide victory for former president Lee Teng-hui (
In 1996, Lee was at the apex of his power in terms of legitimacy (as president and leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT]), his political performance (the nation's economy was at a peak in 1996) and the KMT's organizational strength. His pro-unification opponents did not have the same competitive qualifications.
Lee's clear-cut victory was inevitable even without China's military drills. In 2000, after Zhu issued a strongly worded statement, Chen's approval ratings actually dropped. For Beijing, therefore, the argument that threatening to use military force will create negative counter effects is not backed by facts.
Today, if China really resorts to its old tricks, a crucial point might be the drastic change in the KMT's attitude toward referendum legislation and the constitutional issue.
Though China has never been nice to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), that doesn't mean that Beijing is afraid of the DPP's push for Taiwan independence. This is because the DPP has never garnered more than half of the votes in any national election and the pan-blue force would naturally contain the DPP through inter-party struggles. Simply put, the DPP will not get anywhere.
But the problem would become serious if the KMT also were to favor independence. Since the DPP would not oppose the KMT on this issue, the pro-independence movement could secure a majority and become a force to be reckoned with. That's why China must take it seriously.
In contrast, China had no response when the DPP won the 2000 presidential election and became the majority party in the legislature. Nor did Beijing respond when Chen visited the US and put forth his "one country on each side" dictum. This is not because Beijing prefers the DPP. This is based on its fundamental understanding of Taiwan's political situation.
In addition, some KMT members do not support Chairman Lien Chan's (
Another key lies in the US. With al-Qaeda members recently threatening reprisals, the US has stepped up its security alert, a move that undoubtedly affects its military deployment.
At the same time, there are no signs of a resolution of the military conflict in Iraq in the near future. Beijing might assume that the risk of external interference is decreasing. Taiwan should prepare against China's military threats.
Bill Chang is a former deputy director of the DPP's Chinese Affairs Department.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past