The controversial Special Report VCD -- which contains personal attacks on People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and other opposition politicians -- has led us to wonder: Apart from the freedom-of-speech issue, why have such alternative media appeared in Taiwan where the communication industry is highly developed?
Legislators are not the only ones who enjoy the freedom of speech. Many lawmakers who wag their tongues recklessly usually hide under the umbrella of legislative immunity. They often make irresponsible remarks and completely ignore the feelings of the accused. However, once they are criticized, they rush to court and file lawsuits.
Take Special Report for example. PFP Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅), who was a National Taiwan University professor, filed a lawsuit against the production simply because he is called a "roaring beast" in the VCDs -- which sounds like the word "professor" in Chinese. On one hand, those lawmakers have lost their magnanimity in the face of public criticism. On the other hand, some of them have downgraded themselves to the status of domestic subjects of Soong by filing a lawsuit for him. If Soong feels wronged by the VCDs, he should file a lawsuit by himself.
Next, why have such VCDs appeared in Taiwan where the communication industry is highly developed and the number of broadcast channels is large? The Special Report VCD is considered alternative or underground. Such options appear when society's mainstream media only allow for one voice. They exist in many developing, or even developed, countries worldwide.
From the underground magazines during the tangwai (outside the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT]) movement in the two Chiang's (
Taiwan's television industry is well-developed today, as viewers often enjoy at least 70 to 80 channels. However, this situation is an example of US academic Theodore Peterson's criticism on newspaper liberalism 30 years ago. As he said, gigantic and centralized media may depart from the spirit of a free-speech market, as their owners attempt to achieve political or economic goals through them, sacrificing opposite opinions while boycotting social reforms. Under such circumstances, as he said, the media may become another social and economic class that hampers the freedom of speech and public interests as well.
Taiwan's TV stations have leaned toward commercial interests on the one hand and centralized political ideologies on the other. Most political commentary talk shows on TV are hosted by opposition politicians or those who lean toward the blue camp. As a result, rebuking President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has become a daily routine on those talk shows.
Under such circumstances, Special Report was produced because the voice of Taiwan's grassroots can hardly be heard in the so-called mainstream media. The Taiwanese people's freedom of speech should certainly be respected. Besides, the contents of the VCD are not completely worthless. The VCD, which alleges that Soong may have liver cancer, has reflected some people's doubts.
Freedom of speech is the foundation of democratic politics, and it should be protected and regulated by the law. Politicians should not be afraid of it, and they are not the only ones who enjoy it.
Cheng Tzu-leong is a professor in the Department of Advertising at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US