In an interview with the Washington Post on Oct. 8, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said that "Taiwan is an independent, sovereign country," but "the 23 million people of Taiwan do not have a constitution that genuinely belongs to them." He also said that "as the leader of this country, I have a duty, responsibility, and a strong sense of mission" to push for a new constitution that truly fits the people of Taiwan.
Indeed, the Constitution of the Republic of China (ROC) currently implemented in Taiwan does not belong to Taiwanese people. This Constitution was formulated on the basis of China and the Chinese people. In terms of international law, the San Francisco Peace Treaty, in which Japan renounced its claim over "Formosa and the Pescadores," did not stipulate that Taiwan's sovereignty belongs to China. Since Taiwan is not part of China and since the ROC does not own Taiwan's sovereignty, the ROC Constitution certainly does not belong to Taiwanese people.
Although the ROC Constitution has been imposed on Taiwan and a prototype of Taiwanese democracy has been based on it, it was not tailor-made for Taiwan and its people. Like an adult's outfit put on a kid, it could not fit the child even after alterations. We need a new one. Now is the time for Taiwan to create a constitution to fit the needs of its 23 million people.
In addition, the creation of a constitution can prevent Taiwan from falling into China's trap. If Taiwan still holds onto the ROC Constitution, which claims that Taiwan is part of China, then this is no different from digging its own grave and jumping into the "one China" negotiation trap set up by China. This is definitely not something we want to see.
In fact, only the "one country on each side [of the Taiwan Strait]" platform fits in with Taiwan's optimum benefits in cross-strait negotiations. In his recently published book entitled Ten Sentences that Influenced Taiwan (十句話影響台灣), Examination Yuan President Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) quoted a declassified telegraph from 1971 which revealed that vice foreign minister Yang Hsi-kun (楊西崑) and ambassador to the US George Yeh (葉公超) told then president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) that the Taiwan government should completely separate itself from, and severe its links with, the People's Republic of China (PRC) government so that Taiwan will not be annexed by the PRC.
Obviously, only by separating itself from China will Taiwan gain its optimum benefits. The ROC Constitution established on the basis of "one China" should have been scrapped long ago.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has previously served as foreign minister, premier and vice president, but rather than emulating the wise people of the past, he has acted against his conscience to proclaim that Taiwan is part of the ROC's territory and that Taiwan should amend, rather than rewrite, its constitution so that he can snatch the presidency. He has audaciously attempted to force Taiwan into a disadvantageous position in cross-strait relations, sacrificing the benefits to which the people of Taiwan and Taiwanese businesspeople in China are entitled.
Through integration following the two world wars, Taiwanese people have transformed into what former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called "the new Taiwanese people." A "contract" ought to be signed between them to show their identity with this land. This contract will be Taiwan's new constitution. No matter what content will be stipulated in the constitution, it will be jointly decided by the 23 million people, rather than being forced onto us by 1.2 billion Chinese people. It will be a "new contract" for the "new Taiwanese people."
In addition to reforming the government's structure, this new contract will also declare that Taiwan is not part of China, Taiwan enjoys independent sovereignty and self-determination, and Taiwan is an independent nation. Therefore, the foremost goal of creating a constitution is to build a nation. This will be the only way to meet the needs of Taiwanese people and pursue optimum benefits.
Let us pool our efforts to support President Chen's bid to push for a new constitution and achieve the great cause of building Taiwan as a nation.
David Huang is commissioner of the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission at the Examination Yuan.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US