To prepare for eastward expansion next year, EU members convened an intergovernmental conference on Oct. 4 to negotiate and discuss the content of the draft EU constitution.
If all goes well, the 25 current and future EU members will sign the draft constitution on Europe Day next year and complete domestic ratification procedures over the following two years.
This draft constitution includes five main points: establishing a president's post with a term of two and a half years; establishing an EU foreign minister's post; formulating a common defense and foreign policy; mapping out the legally binding European Charter of Fundamental Rights; and endowing the EU with the status of a "juridical person."
To enable this draft constitution to accommodate an enlarged EU, and to thoroughly transform the current EU structure and mechanisms, former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing chaired the European Convention to hear people's opinions regarding institutional reforms and the EU's development through public and transparent discussions. This is to make sure that EU policy truly reflects the thoughts of Europeans.
To achieve lasting peace and stability, EU countries drafted their constitution from a long-term point of view. Based on the common goal of constructing a beautiful Europe, the members have repeatedly consulted each other, showing this community's tolerance for dissent.
Since the European Convention was established to create a constitution, EU institutions and the community's new and old members have all joined hands to participate in the discussions. These discussions have highlighted the EU's respect for the public will in each country, and its pursuit of shared values to create a new European culture.
Taiwan can learn a lesson from the EU. At the ceremony celebrating the Democratic Progressive Party's 17th anniversary, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said, "By working with the 23 million Taiwanese people, the party should push for a new constitution in 2006 and put it to a referendum."
This is a proposal that fits in with the trends of the time. Taiwan should emulate EU countries to formulate a new constitution that regards Taiwan as the primary entity and meets real needs. People's collective will should be expressed through a referendum. This can strengthen the legality, legitimacy and feasibility of Taiwan's new constitution, thereby putting into practice the idea of "people power."
Taiwan's democratization requires strengthening and deepening. It is a matter of great urgency to write a new, feasible constitution to project a grand vision for Taiwan's existence and development in the international community, establish a sound political structure, and further safeguard people's freedoms and rights.
A new constitution is indispensable for Taiwan to become a normal, first-class country.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US