In the gently undulating semi-desert, 10 minutes' drive from the dusty northern Jordanian town of Mafraq and the old single-track Hejaz Railway that Lawrence of Arabia targeted 85 years ago, lies the sprawling campus of an international university which forms part of Jordan's strategy to counter extremist Islam.
In a part of the world often associated in the West with bigoted fundamentalism, Aal al-Bait University has a "special mission," says its president, Salman al-Badur: "To teach students academic subjects; and to create Islamic moderation, Islamic tolerance."
Established in 1993, the university was part of Jordan's answer to the rising regional tide of Islamic fundamentalism.
"When King Hussein dedicated this university, he stated this very clearly," al-Badur said. "We are here to teach tolerance. We're not limited to one point of view -- the Sunni, or the Shia, the Zaidi or the Alawi.
We teach all Islamic traditions."
He explained: "Every student, even those studying subjects such as computer science, physics and chemistry, has to be acquainted with the problems facing the Islamic world, with the differences between Muslims themselves. Every student has to study comparative religion."
Aal al-Bait -- which roughly translates as "family of the Prophet" -- now has some 7,000 students and 300 teaching staff. Most of the students are Jordanian but a significant number are foreign.
"We have students from Malaysia, Iran, Indonesia, Brunei, the US, Russia, Herzegovina, Ghana and Senegal," said al-Badur, a philosopher who has studied and taught at universities as diverse as Damascus, Tehran, Princeton and Harvard.
As in all eight of Jordan's public universities, academic standards at Aal al-Bait are high and competition for places is fierce. The university's preoccupation with Islam does not mean that the students are all Muslims. Echoing the religious structure of the kingdom's 5 million people, they include some Christians.
Islamism is nothing new in Jordan. The country's first King, Abdullah, encouraged conservative Islamic sentiment as a means of staving off the demands for greater democracy of secular-minded Arab nationalists. His successor, King Hussain, while paying necessary lip-service to nationalism, took a similar line. After the catastrophic Arab defeat in the 1967 war with Israel, however, nationalism declined and Islamism became the region's most dynamic political force, threatening the existing order, including the conservative, Western-backed monarchies like Jordan's that had survived nationalist hegemony.
In Syria and Iraq and other states, Islamism was held in check by sweeping and cruel repression. King Hussain took another, arguably more intelligent, road, seeking to tame the Islamists by making them an integral part of the system as the "loyal opposition."
In 1989, Jordan held its first free and fair general election for three decades. The Islamic Action Front (IAF) -- essentially the political wing of the main Islamist movement, the Ikhwan al-Muslimoun or Muslim Brotherhood -- won 22 parliamentary seats, a quarter of the total.
This was a bit more than the regime had anticipated. For the 1993 elections the voting rules were changed in a way that would work against the IAF, whose seats declined to 19. Angered, the IAF boycotted the 1997 elections. The 2000 election was delayed until June this year, when the IAF returned 17 members to parliament, including one woman. In addition, the IAF could count on the support of five or six independent Islamists.
Although far from forming a parliamentary majority, the IAF is the only organized party in Jordan's parliament. All the other members of parliament (MPs) represent tribes, clans or regions.
"In this parliament there are no real political movements except the IAF," said Deputy Speaker Ali Abu al-Sukkar.
His view was endorsed by a well-placed Western diplomat: "The IAF is the only coherent party."
To avoid alienating Islamic sentiment, the monarchy has emphasized its religious credentials, including the royal family's descent from the Prophet Muhammad. It has encouraged moderation by giving Islamists a stake in the system (albeit that Jordan's parliament in practice has only limited powers) and by such steps as establishing Aal al-Bait University.
At the same time, it has used more direct methods to neutralise Islamists (and others) deemed to be beyond the political pale, justifying this to Western audiences since Sept. 11 as part of the "war on terrorism." The kingdom's key internal security agency, the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), stands accused of harassing, detaining and maltreating dissidents. It's a far cry from the brutalities of outright police states but the GID's excesses fit awkwardly with Jordan's carefully cultivated image as an oasis of tolerance and decency in a regional desert of political oppression.
"In all Third World countries, it's the mukhabarat [secret police] who exert control and we are one of those countries," said Abdul Majid Thnaibat, superindendent-general of the Muslim Brotherhood, although he conceded that Jordan was nevertheless "better than any other Arab country."
Elsewhere in the region, he explained, "the president is the head of a party, not the head of state. Here, the king is for everybody."
Asked early this year whether the regime's attitude towards democracy had improved in recent years, Shaikh Hamza Mansour, head of the IAF, declared: "No, it's worse."
He complained of "unceasing repression," inking this to the government's failure to resist anti-Islamic pressures from its key foreign backer, the US.
At grassroots level, Islamism remains easily the dominant political force in Jordan.
"In general, people here don't consider bin Laden's actions to be criminal, but acts of self-defense," said Abd as-Salam al-Fandi, Imam of the small Ahmad Bin Taimiyah Mosque in the village of Ba al-Jadid, 13km west of the capital, Amman.
"We [Muslims] don't attack. We just defend," he said.
He said Muslims deeply resented the West's support for Israel's dispossession of the Palestinians, its drive for hegemony and its appetite for the Islamic world's oil and other resources.
"The people hate the US for what it did and this makes them like bin Laden. An eye for an eye," he said.
Reflecting the majority view in Jordan, al-Fandi stressed: "It's not just a [conventional] fight over borders. The people believe that it's a fight to affirm the existence of Islam."
The extent to which Islamism gathers even more momentum in Jordan will depend on the West's readiness to respect regional sensibilities. The invasion of Iraq and US President George W. Bush's failure to bring peace between Israelis and Palestinians suggest that the hardline fundamentalist tide will continue to rise. Whether there will ultimately be a place for the moderation symbolized and fostered by Aal Al-Bait University remains to be seen.
Alan George is the author of Syria: Neither Bread Nor Freedom.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers