The weakening of the US dollar accelerated after finance ministers from the G7 issued a communique calling for market-oriented international exchange rates. Soon afterward, the Japanese yen set a two-year high against the greenback. Of course, Japanese exporters are complaining bitterly that the rising value of the yen will cause their profits to erode. This has brought considerable political pressure to support government intervention in forex markets to avoid further advances in the value of the yen. In turn, officials in Tokyo have been jawboning the markets and implied that they will continue to weigh in to thwart foreign-exchange speculation and stem appreciation.
However, the doom-laden estimates offered do not consider the total impact of an appreciating yen. A focus only on the impact on exporters overlooks the fact that a strengthening currency benefits importers who buy more goods with fewer yen. And domestic producers are able to buy imported inputs for less. Meanwhile, many Japanese companies have offshore production facilities that will offset the impact of an appreciating yen on their ability to hold market share.
While a stronger currency may adversely affect some exports, this impact is mitigated through diversification of domestic production. Intervening in currency markets discourages producers from making decisions that will be in their long-term interest.
It turns out that these interventions cannot alter the inevitable gains in the yen against the dollar because of the inherent weakness in the US currency. Most market analysts and dealers expect the dollar to continue its downward path.
This is perhaps the most ruinous outcome of the irresponsible monetary policy pursued by the US Federal Reserve under Chairman Alan Greenspan. By forcing interest rates down artificially, it has caused such a massive flood of dollars into the system that no amount of intervention will be able to stem its decline on global currency markets.
While forex intervention is likely to be fruitless, it involves high costs and is a distraction from implementing other policies that could promote long-term growth. Indeed, currency intervention goes against the most basic notion of financial prudence. Basically, buying dollars that are certain to be less valuable with yen that are becoming more valuable is equivalent to a "buy high, sell low" activity.
While the net impact of market-induced changes in currency valuations is uncertain, there is also no way to know what the proper market rate of exchange is. And so, forex intervention is a highly speculative and Quixotic adventure that should be avoided.
In all events, currency values are less important as a determinant of long-run competitiveness than rising growth in productivity. Policy makers should be focusing on how to insure that the investment and regulatory climate is inviting for both domestic and foreign investors.
There are other and better tools at the disposal of policy makers in Tokyo if they wish to improve the capacity of their economy to grow. These include reducing the overall tax burden, reducing public-sector debt, cutting government spending and reducing waste or corruption.
On the microeconomic side, a rising yen will force out some inefficient firms that operate on small margins to eliminate some of the excess capacity that remains in the domestic manufacturing sector. Although it may be painful, the reduction of overcapacity and elimination of nonviable companies will improve the overall economic climate.
Of course, a sharp increase in the value of a currency could increase foreign exchange risks that could then lead to a sudden decline. But the current volatility of the yen is certainly within acceptable bounds. And economic fundamentals suggest that there is no heavy downside threat. Although it is impossible to know what the optimum level of any currency is, there is scant evidence that the yen has overshot its long-term position. Meanwhile, neither the US nor the EU has done much to curb the decline of the dollar.
Attempting to establish the "right" exchange rate is another example of hubris displayed by policy makers. History is littered with failed attempts by government agencies or industry groups to set prices. Such failures have been recorded with price intervention on commodities, rental properties and exchange rates.
Ultimately, decisions by many individual market participants who are disconnected in purpose and space will determine currency values by taking decisions that they are not aware they will make in the future. While politicians and bureaucrats will continue to exhibit a predilection to meddle, it is better to allow prices of currencies and other things to be discovered in the complex interactions of human choices instead of political design.
Of course, Japan has a formidable arsenal of foreign reserves to do whatever it wishes. But the erratic behavior of the Bank of Japan and the Japanese government concerning the valuation of the yen casts doubts upon the viability of such a project. Both have spent most of the post-war era fulminating over market valuations of the yen and fighting a Procrustean battle to move it toward some specified value. And not so long ago, worries were expressed about a yen meltdown since the zero-interest rate policy increased the attractiveness of foreign bonds to Japanese investors.
Like in so many other areas of government activity, forex intervention creates a batch of unintended consequences and distortion effects. It turns out that there is a remarkably consistent lack of success when governments attempt to support prices of commodities or currencies. Therefore, it is likely that this move may lead to greater instability and lower economic growth.
Christopher Lingle is professor of economics at Universidad Francisco Marroque in Guatemala and global strategist for eConoLytics.com.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US