Is it the case that only when everything goes perfectly can a military exercise be called successful? The answer, I am afraid, is no.
Japan's Self-Defense Force accidentally shot down a plane carrying officers. A US military aircraft snapped a cable-car line in Italy, causing serious casual-ties. The Kursk submarine, the pride of Russia, sank after an explosion in a torpedo chamber. Accidents are almost symbiotic with military exercises.
A number of missiles missing their targets during the recent Hankuang exercises have trig-gered a debate, but exercises are meant to find out problems. An exercise that goes "perfectly" may be problematic.
Take, for example, the US Army's exercises. "Professional" imaginary enemy troops play the opponent's role with the enemy's thinking and war tactics. However, special emphasis is given to the fact that the value of an exercise is not in the outcome, but in understanding drawbacks and encouraging the units under training to improve and grow. Except for violations of exercise rules or obvious human negligence, the personnel are not punished for simple weapon malfunctions or missing their targets.
The intent is obvious. If one merely emphasizes punishing people for deficiencies, then military exercises could become a fabrication contest and will not achieve the goal of identifying and solving problems.
In contrast, the world's attention has revolved around technical issues such as missiles missing their targets and a snapped torpedo wire. What truly deserves attention are key issues such as joint operations and exercise settings because they reflect the military's strategic thinking and planning. But there has been little debate on these issues.
First, strengthening joint operations has become a key area in multiplying combat power. Unfortunately, no concrete results were seen in this regard during the Hankuang exercises. Ostensibly, all three services arrived at same location. The exercise items, however, seemed to indicate that each was fighting on its own. There was a lack of coordinated support and synchronized attacks, which are the soul of joint operations.
As for the exercise settings, they were still unable to break away from the traditional "air supremacy, naval supremacy and anti-landing" thinking. Unfortunately, the linear rules following a prescribed order on the battlefield that were used in the past have been replaced by "non-linearity." A massive change has occurred in staff organization and troops combat arrays.
In the past, for example, one had to break through layers of defense -- like peeling an onion -- before one could bomb the enemy's core targets. Now one only needs stealth technologies or long-range precision munitions to carry that out. Similarly, a People's Liberation Army (PLA) attack on Taiwan will not conform to our military's configured procedure. The military has little to gain from holding the Hankuang exercises in the same model as it has done in the past.
There are no fixed rules in war. Innovation is the one and only way to win a war. As for the Hankuang exercises, it would be unfortunate if the commentators fall into "weapons determinism" in their analyses or deduct conclusions from "the previous war" instead of studying possible trends in future warfare.
In comparison, Japan has proposed "active self-defense" while the PLA, in addition to importing new hardware, is aggressively introducing ideas from foreign armies. For example, a decapitation action with an emphasis on "attacking the heart" could be applied to the Taiwan Strait.
Those on our side who focus on military hardware and adhere to the "tenacious defense, effective deterrence" dictum should pay attention to such strategies.
Lee Wen-chung is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Francis Huang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past