A deadly fire in Luchou City, Taipei County, occurred less than 36 hours after the Wanan No. 26 emergency drills were held. Ironically, after watching the perfect drills on TV the day before, the viewers were immediately drawn back to reality by the shocking footage of the blaze.
The fire this time was not caused by new problems. There were neither terrorists nor biochemical weapons, and the fire broke out in an ordinary narrow alley packed with dozens of motorcycles. No surprise, many illegally-built structures blocked the passages of the building, iron bars on windows prevented escape and some escape ropes had been removed after previous safety checks. These things are seen almost every where. Why have these problems never been resolved? Is this the fate of the Taiwanese?
I participated in several emergency drills when I was studying Disaster Medicine in the US. The purpose of such drills was to find problems, which is also the most important step in solving them. An exercise is considered a complete failure if no flaw is discovered. As a result, a large number of people from different professions are usually invited to make criticisms during the drills, in order to check the emergency process and to discover possible areas for improvement. Some drills last for a whole day, because problems may occur some time after the operations begin.
I have been a drill evaluator before, but could hardly accept the US' kind of drill. By Taiwanese standards, the US drills were too chaotic -- everything appeared unrehearsed and some participants even argued with one another. When I watched CNN's live coverage of disasters, how-ever, although there was still chaos and arguments, they were less serious than those during the emergency drills. This showed the value of the US-style drills.
In Taiwan, unfortunately, drills have become a form of drama, aimed at presenting a perfectly run show to government leaders and the media. In terms of drill preparation, the most important part is perhaps whether an exercise is exciting enough, how to show off the functions of newly-purchased equipment and how to create a tense atmosphere. As for the loopholes in disaster handling and technical difficulties, drill organizers make them disappear by changing the plot.
Everything is way too perfect. A drill always ends with some officials' lectures and praise. What flaws are there in the drill? No one knows. Who knows that the height of firefighting ladders is limited and the water can hardly reach higher? Who knows that it takes time to conduct such exercises if rescuers wear protective suits and even more time to set up emergency tents on the spot? Who knows that all the locations or buildings where drills take place are specially selected? Who knows that it takes complex procedures to gather those emergency units in real life?
Since everything is perfect in the drills across the nation, no wonder the reality is miserable!
A drill usually incurs considerable social costs. During the Wanan No. 26 drills, many people were trapped on the roads or forced to delay appointments. But none of us complained, because we had to carry out exercises to find out and solve problems.
Drill organizers have the responsibility to present the real look of an emergency, as much as possible, in order to make society understand the reality of disaster- prevention work. Government authorities have the responsibility to discover problems and resolve them. They do not have to solve all problems at once. But at least each drill should be better than the previous one.
We are willing to cooperate without complaint or regret if such drills can help those in charge find problems. If not, then perhaps it's helpful for them to make personal inspections at the front line. After all, the problems that exist are, for the most part, decades old. Who says that the performance of airborne-rescue work should always be included in the Wanan drills?
If those in charge view such drills as a show and not a chance to discover errors and flaws in the system, they might as well hire Hollywood directors and stars to produce disaster-prevention videos -- they would do a much better job. Not only would such videos be highly entertaining, but they will have a greater effect on educating and influencing people compared to the illusory drills we have now.
Frank Shih is an attending physician in the emergency department at the National Taiwan University Hospital.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS