Many people's memories of baseball are refreshed when they are around the intersection of Tunhua North Road and Nanking East Road, where the Taipei Baseball Park used to be. The stadium meant a lot even to those who are not hardcore baseball fans, as it is part of the shared memories of the baseball craze in the 1970s and 1980s.
Soon, in place of the stadium there will be a small dome -- a "multi-functional" stadium. But none of the functions includes hosting baseball games. So where is the dome in which we can have a baseball game? Nobody knows.
The dome project is an interesting case of public policy-making. In the early 1990s when people were crazy about professional baseball, building a dome seemed to be a certainty. It seemed to be an unmistakable reality that with no domes, professional baseball in this country would be doomed. But the reality is that the only reason Taiwan needs to build a dome is because it rains a lot here. However, global warming and drastic climate changes in recent years has made this rationale outdated.
A well-known pitcher who had played in Japan was once invited to provide commentary on a live baseball game. Asked for his opinion on an indoor stadium, the veteran said that he preferred playing outdoors. He thought it was boring to play indoors, where he saw no seasonal changes or daylight. An awkward silence ensued on the show, because building a dome had been an unchallengeable vision.
The US professional baseball league is more than 100 years old. But how many American cities have domes? Hundred-year-old outdoor ballparks in Boston and Chicago hold the memories of generations of Americans. Do they have to be changed to indoor ones too? Taiwan's problem is that it doesn't have a good baseball park, not that it doesn't have a dome. So why not transform the site of Taipei's old baseball park into a good outdoor ballpark?
Many other public policies in Taiwan often get confused. Politicians and interest groups simply want grand projects to win them both fame and money. But these projects may not be realizable. Meanwhile, they turn a blind eye to relatively small but manageable projects that cost less.
Does Taichung really need a branch of the Guggenheim Museum? Many provincial museums are still in a mess, so how can we be confident that we'll be able to manage a world-class museum? Besides, Taichung has one of the best museums of natural sciences. Why don't we develop projects to make it better?
The Kaohsiung Museum of Fine Arts, with its first-class exhibition layout, claims that it will make its outdoor space similar to that of Hakone Art Museum in Japan. I wonder how many good art pieces it has collected so far though? Every place in Taiwan wants a local airport, yet has it ever occurred to people that with less money, we can create a more effective transportation network simply by connecting highways and high-speed railways?
The Taiwan Railway Administration (TRA) is an even sadder case. Its employees blame its problems on Taiwan High Speed Railway Co. But if you have taken a Japan Rail train or an AMTRAK train in the US, you know that the TRA's fundamental problem has nothing to do with the high-speed rail project. It's TRA's service that stinks. Anyone who has tried its ticketing system knows how user-unfriendly it is.
Nobody will spend time to review the projects that do not take much money but a lot of effort to improve. Politicians know that these projects won't make them famous or conglomerates big money.
Taiwan has not been making progress but is spinning around empty issues and wasting its resources. A key reason for this phenomenon is that from top down, everyone is dreaming of being the world's No. 1.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY JENNIE SHIH
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95