On July 20, 100 people from educational circles issued a joint statement criticizing the nation's educational reforms. This statement has become a focus of media attention. The public is also concerned about Minister of Educa-tion Huang Jong-tsun's (黃榮村) response to the statement.
Why did the statement attract such great attention? I believe it's because "educational reforms" have become a sacred term. The reforms have always carried a noble and moral halo. Everyone has been used to saying good things about the reforms, so we are not accustomed to hearing criticism of them.
Educational reforms involve not only concepts but also many concrete measures. We all know that some basic concepts for governing a nation are sacred, but no concrete measure by any government is holy. Sometimes, we might think that tax cuts are a good thing. As time changes, however, such a policy might need to be amended.
It is the same for educational reforms. Some of the measures are good and some are bad.
I suggest that Huang deal with this matter in a relaxed manner. Education is closely related to a nation's competitiveness and it should be reviewed once in a while. The Ministry of Education should take the opportunity to examine the flaws in today's education. Whether these flaws resulted from educational reforms is beside the point. Society only hopes that Huang can find these problems and work out solutions.
We used to regard educational reforms as sacred. We cannot reverse the thinking now and believe that going against educational reforms is holy. Society should allow some time for the education ministry to deal with this issue. Perhaps some politicians will hype it into an issue but I hope Huang can reduce such interference with wisdom. He had better not make any response right away. Reacting too soon is dangerous because some pleasure-seekers love to see a hot debate. Politicians especially love it because large disputes are their only chance for grandstanding.
Neither supporting nor opposing educational reforms is sacred. Next year's presidential election is even less sacred. What is holiest is education for the nation's numerous students. What Huang now should do is to examine whether our millions of high school and primary school students are getting a good education.
Sometimes we still have to look at figures. In the just finished college entrance exams, the higher standard score (高標, average score of the better 50 percent of students) in the subject of English is 60 and the lower standard score (低標, average of the other half) is only 18. If I am right, around 10,000 students have an English score of less than 10. Seeing these unpleasant figures, I don't think we can call Taiwan's education perfect.
There is nothing wrong with being for or against educational reforms. There is only one problem: whether serious faults exist in our education. It is unlikely that these faults were created solely by the current government. There is no need for the education minister to admit to all these mistakes. But society would definitely require that the minister resolve these problems.
How can the minister settle these problems? Pragmatism should be the most important factor. Feasibility should be considered for any new measure, rather than whether it is derived from sublime ideals. To put it straight, we should keep an eye on the possible after-effects to be created by the implementation of this new measure.
If the education minister's think tank is composed of careless people who do not like to discuss details, I don't think the minister can resolve problems. He might even see more problems emerge.
Huang must forget his erstwhile status as an academic. He must remind himself that he is the education minister and that millions of students' education depends on his decisions.
If Huang can leave the past behind and focus on students, he will be able to resist political interference and adopt the necessary measures. People will not remember whether Huang promoted or opposed educational reforms but they will remember that he was a good, responsible minister.
Lee Chia-tung is a professor at National Chi-nan University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US