Across the Arab world, the fall of Baghdad on April 9 is seen as a day of shame, reminiscent of June 5, 1967, when Israel defeated the armies of three Arab countries, conquering the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem in a mere six days.
Arab intellectuals, and indeed the wider Arab public, are now busy trying to analyze and understand the lessons of the Iraqi earthquake. Meanwhile, supporters of the former Baathist regime in Iraq and others are now busy defending the same old totalitarian mindset. Their tactic has been to obstruct a clear review of the Iraqi catastrophe by suggesting that any criticism of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussin's regime is tantamount to supporting the US-led occupation of Iraq.
For example, Fahd al-Fanek, a former Baath Party member, is now a columnist for the Jordanian newspaper al-Ra'i. In April, he wrote that the end of Saddam's hold on power in Iraq "provided the opportunity for the enemies of the regime to shed crocodile tears at democracy and to denounce repression and dictatorship as an indirect gesture welcoming the American occupation." None of the anti-Saddam sentiment, Al-Fanek argued, was "intended to serve the cause of democracy, but to support the American position and justify the American occupation."
Interestingly, such retrospective support for Saddam and his dictatorial regime is now being met with growing indignation in the Arab World, because ordinary Arabs are only now learning of the crimes perpetrated by the Baath Party regime. Apologists for Saddam's rule are now facing some difficult questions.
There is precedent for such soul-searching in the Arab world. In the aftermath of Israel's 1967 victory, Sadeq Jalal Al-Azm, a well-know Syrian intellectual and a professor of philosophy, published a book entitled Self-criticism after the defeat, which sharply criticized many aspects of Arab political culture. Al-Azm's book became a sensation, stimulating a wave of reviews and polemical exchanges.
Back then, the paramount question was: How did a small state like Israel defeat the armies of three Arab countries and occupy vast areas of Egyptian, Jordanian and Syrian territory in a few days? This question still echoes through the decades, and the many answers have dwelled not only on military failings, but on broader questions concerning Arab political, economic, cultural, and technological development.
The prevailing response in the 1960s to Israel's triumph was that the Arabs should adapt the guerilla strategies pursued by the Vietnamese, Chinese and Cubans. Later on, the Soviet model became popular among nationalist and leftist movements fighting for independence when they seized power in Syria, Iraq and South Yemen. Demands for democracy, popular participation and political pluralism were shelved in favor of pan-Arab national slogans urging Arab unity, the liberation of Palestine and opposition to imperialism.
But looking back on the 1970s and 1980s, the socioeconomic failures of the despotic regimes that embodied this worldview are glaringly obvious. Their countries sank deeply into debt, with low rates of growth, endemic corruption and bloated public sectors. Prisons were overcrowded, and cultural expression was stifled. Unsurprisingly, these regimes viewed the slightest criticism as treason and subversion.
This was the stagnant context in which Iraq embarked on its military expansionism in 1991, aimed at the occupation of Kuwait. Although the Iraqi forces were quickly expelled from Kuwait, Saddam's overwhelming defeat did nothing to undermine his stature in the Arab world. The remnants of Saddam's army were not pursued within Iraq, allowing him to crush the popular insurrection staged in the south, and remain in power. Despite trying to annex an Arab neighbor, Saddam was able to claim the nationalist mantle against the Americans.
Today, the previously unknown crimes committed by Saddam's regime against numberless thousands of Iraqis are being revealed. Around the Arab world, people are comparing the nationalist rhetoric of the regime with the scope of its barbarism. Shame at the price the Iraqi people have paid for the false face of the Baathist regime can be detected everywhere. It is becoming clear that no achievement, regardless of how great it may be, can justify the human cost that the Iraqi people paid over the last four decades.
In the weeks since the overthrow of Saddam's regime, and despite the US occupation, Iraqis are exercising an increasing degree of control over their daily lives. They are choosing local councils, publishing newspapers, and organizing various political and social organizations. The reconstruction of Iraq, which has now begun, will continue.
The echoes of the Iraqi quake are being felt in every Arab capital, including those that put their faith in oil riches to protect them from popular discontent. Demands for political and economic reform are escalating. The winds of change will blow once again through the Middle East, which remains threatened by both religious fundamentalism and foreign pressure. The best alternative to both is a voluntary movement toward democratic openness and political pluralism, enabling citizens across the Arab world to participate in making the future of their countries.
Hani Hourani, a political analyst, is director-general of Al-Urdun al-Jadid, a research center based in Amman, Jordan.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past