The world's top soil scientists met on the rich granite plains west of Brisbane, Australia, this week to over turn some long cherished farming practices. \nThey examined physical proof that the annual cycle of digging up soil to plant crops and spread fertilizer was robbing farmers of higher incomes and harming the environment. \nDelegates to the special session of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization (ISTRO) saw alternative techniques that could cut man-made greenhouse emissions by as much as 5 per cent in as little as five years. \nJeff Tullberg professor of soil sciences at the University of Queensland, Australia, and president of ISTRO, described the changes as both simple yet dramatic in terms of methods and benefits. \n"It has been held since time immemorial that breaking or tilling the soil was essential to let it `breathe' and make it more fertile," he says. \n"But many soil scientists around the world have questioned that, and now all the data has come together to make the case to the contrary." \nTullberg says this excessive tilling means the soils `exhale' far more carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide than they would in a natural or non-farming cycle of growth and decay. \nBoth gases contribute significantly to the greenhouse effect which has been linked to global warming and the outbreak of wild weather across the planet. \nWhile nitrous oxide is created naturally in swampy soils, its leakage from fields is multiplied by the breakdown of nitrogenous fertilizers and the engine emissions of large farm machines. \n"Essentially, what we have done on our farms is to make our fields give up a surplus of greenhouse gases that would otherwise have remained locked in the ground," Tullberg said. \n"We have also been able to prove that the excessive leakage of these gases renders the soil less fertile over time." he said. \nAccording to the papers presented at the conference, the key to the soil fertility is worms, which are all too often wiped out by overuse of fertilizers and pesticides -- and by being dug up. \n"Worms open up soils for water, air and nutrients. They make it store more water and they load the earth with carbon-rich organic material," Tullberg said. \n"The concept that untilled soil will turn to rock-hard clay is only true if there are too few worms, and too much compacting of the soil by the wheels of heavy tractors and harvesters," he said. \n"This has brought us to the second reason for the problem, excessive traffic over our crops," he says. "We have now demonstrated that, by reducing heavy traffic and minimizing digging, and spreading the right composts over the surface, we can lift the worm population up eightfold." \nThe soil scientists emphasized that the carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide concentrations in the atmosphere are continually created by natural and industrial processes and circulated in the atmosphere before being cycled back into the soils and oceans. \nBut in modern times these cycles have become unbalanced, creating rising concentrations of greenhouse gases last found in the atmosphere during the intense episode of global warming that preceded the onset of the last ice age, about 130,000 years ago. \nTullberg says the consensus on the proportion of man-made greenhouse gases from agriculture is about 25 percent of the total, with the rest emitted by cars, heavy industry, and the use of fire and machines to clear vast tracts of forest. \n"If we can reduce leakage from farms by 20 percent, this translates to a comparatively easy reduction of 5 percent in global green house outputs," he said. \n"We say it is easy because we don't have to invent any new technology. All we have to do is change the way we till the land, saving on fertilizer along the way," he said. \nThe world's largest tractor and harvester manufacturer, John Deere, stunned delegates midway through the conference when it announced a new range of equipment that would help cut the damage done by heavy vehicles to sensitive crop soils. \nThe company said it would produce tractor/harvester combinations where the wheels on both would track in perfect alignment, instead of one set of tracks falling inside the other. \nThe much smaller British tractor maker JCB started a similar program two years ago. \n"This is an incredibly simple way of reducing degradation by compaction," Tullberg says. "The current type of machine inflicts some degree of damage to about 85 percent of the acreage planted with a crop like wheat." \n"Accurate tracking and better management of the machines cuts this to only 15 percent of land under cultivation," he said. \nThe new machines are also designed to use the latest satellite navigation systems accurate to eight centimeters, allowing precision cultivation and harvesting in the worst weather. \nTullberg says: "The bottom line is that this costs very little, can be done very quickly, and leads to a lasting improvement in the richness of soils, with better crops from less fertilizer." \n"I think this is by far the best fix anyone has come up with for a sizeable part of the global warming problem." he says. \n"But I know other groups of scientists are also working on animal flatulence -- so, if they come up with a means for reducing the amount of methane coming out of cattle, we will be making better progress on climate change than we might have dared to hope for a few years ago," he says.
Oppression is painful, and not being able to express it increases the pain 10-fold. This level of pain is something that Uighurs, Tibetans and Mongolians understand all too well. A question often posed to Uighurs in the international arena is: “You say you are facing genocide, but why don’t we see corpses, like in Rwanda and in Bosnia?” If you were a Uighur, what would you say? What if you replied: “The source of the problem is your lack of vision. It’s an indication of your weakness and China’s strength, and it is not a matter of our sincerity.” Such a harsh response would
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) Double Ten National Day address has attracted a great deal of analysis and many different interpretations. One core question is why Tsai chose this occasion to discuss Taiwan’s national status. What was her main motive and what effect did she intend to have? These are issues that clearly need further clarification. The section of Tsai’s speech that attracted the most attention internationally was, not surprisingly, the part where she laid out “four commitments” that she said should serve as common ground for all Taiwanese, regardless of political affiliation. The commitments were to liberal democracy and constitutional government; that the
Double Ten Day, Oct. 10 every year, is an important day for Taiwan, as it marks the Republic of China’s (ROC) National Day. Major holidays are usually a time for celebration and commemorative activities, but among all the clamor and excitement, Double Ten reflects one essential fact: that Taiwan is still not a normalized society. As usual, there was a large parade in front of the Presidential Office Building, displaying to the world Taiwan’s social diversity and its soft and hard power, and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) gave an address, relaying her message to the nation and to the world, while the
Ever since former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was recalled last year, “Han fans,” as well as the KMT hierarchy, have made pro-Taiwan lawmakers their enemy No. 1, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) has been on top of that list (“Recall part of ‘generational war’: expert,” Oct. 19, page 3). Chen has always been one of Han’s harshest critics, and Han fans have vowed revenge. Former legislators Yen Kuan-hen (顏寬恆) and Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), being such sore losers, were not amused about losing to Chen democratically and have amassed significant resources backed by