A century and a half after America forced Japan to open up to the West at gunpoint, the two nations are locked in a diplomatic embrace that has some Japanese longing for freedom from the whims of the world's sole superpower.
Exactly 150 years after US Commodore Matthew Perry's "Black Ships" arrived in Tokyo Bay to persuade Japan to abandon two centuries of isolation, Tokyo is preparing to enact a law to allow its military to help US forces rebuild war-torn Iraq.
The legislation is the latest aimed at raising the profile of Japan's military and strengthening its security alliance with the US, forged after Tokyo's defeat in World War II.
But not all Japanese accept the wisdom of closer ties with Washington, which they see lurching towards unilateralism.
"It's no ordinary relationship," says Shusei Tanaka, a former cabinet minister and one-time adviser to Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi.
"We're dealing with a country which doesn't think just about its own security, but about how it wants the world to be, and then sets its security agenda," Tanaka said.
If ties are further strengthened, "we would have to be tagging along all year long," he said.
Despite such concerns, worries over nearby North Korea's nuclear arms programs are pushing Japanese leaders to forge closer security ties with Washington.
Koizumi and his aides said Tokyo had no choice but to support Washington in the Iraq war to ensure that US forces would come to Japan's rescue should North Korea attack Tokyo.
Fear of abandonment
"We need sustained efforts to maintain the trust ... We need to strengthen the Japan-US alliance. We need to make it more `reciprocal,'" said Deputy Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe, one of Koizumi's top aides, after the Iraq war began.
Koizumi has taken some landmark steps to boost Japan's security role overseas at Washington's request -- despite criticism that he is eroding Japan's pacifist Constitution.
Following the September 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, Japan swiftly passed a law enabling Tokyo to provide logistical support for US forces in Afghanistan.
That reflected Tokyo's desire to avoid the embarrassment it suffered during the 1991 Gulf War when it pitched in US$11 billion but sent no troops, as well as to respond to a US request for a visible Japanese presence in the "war on terrorism."
But Tokyo's obsession with meeting US requests to "show the flag" in Afghanistan or put "boots on the ground" in Iraq also stems from a fear of being abandoned by the US.
"That's the dynamic of the past 50 years -- abandonment and entrapment," said Richard Samuels of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who heads the school's Japan program.
"A balance has to be struck between the fear of abandonment and the fear of being dragged into war," he said.
While "neo-conservative" lawmakers like Abe urge Japan to play a greater global security role to share America's burden, others want Tokyo to free itself from its dependent status.
Just say `No'
Younger Japanese lawmakers say that while the security alliance is vital for Japan's own protection and for regional stability, Tokyo should speak out against US unilateralism.
"I don't see Japan parting ways with the United States any time in the foreseeable future," said Seiji Maehara, a lawmaker with the main opposition Democratic Party.
"But we need to tell the United States that there are international rules, that it can't get away with just anything simply because it has the power," added the 41-year-old Maehara, who is in charge of national security in the Democrats' shadow cabinet.
Nationalist Shintaro Ishihara, Tokyo's popular governor, goes even further, arguing Japan should develop a capability to strike North Korea itself as there is no guarantee that US forces would come to its rescue.
The security treaty "is not reciprocal at all. Japan is having to share an excessive burden," says Ishihara, who wants Washington to give up part of a US airbase in Tokyo.
Around 47,000 US military personnel are stationed in over 90 facilities in Japan and resentment towards their presence flares up whenever they are involved in crimes, especially on Okinawa, where most are stationed.
Still, Japan seems unlikely to strike out on its own.
"Maybe more and more people are trying to sound more nationalistic, more independent in their rhetoric, but they are not so stupid as to seriously consider severing our ties with the United States or even decreasing the degree of interdependence," said Kunihiko Saito, a former ambassador to Washington.
"Even Ishihara, if he comes back to national politics, I don't think would really pursue that course," he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers