The "Wolf of Hwakang," who was convicted of 25 cases of sexual assault and nine thefts, is in the news again, as he has been for the two last years, over the question of whether he should be paroled so he can matriculate at National Taiwan University (Taida). Not to make light of the seriousness of his crimes, but given what is turning into an annual rite of officious pronouncements, psychiatric babble and general hand-wringing, this issue is becoming Taiwan's own version of summer madness.
The Wolf, surnamed Yang, received a 17-year sentence for his crimes. Whether one thinks this was adequate punishment is not the issue here. After serving one-third of his sentence, he took and passed an admission exam two years ago, winning a place at Taida's sociology department. His bid for parole was rejected that year, as it was last year. He has applied again, hoping to be freed in time to start the fall semester.
Serial rape differs from other crimes as it raises the question of the perpetrators' ability to control biological responses. Such a psychological disease must be treated with drugs. Moral exhortation simply does not help.
People concerned with the Wolf's case have said he has been a model prisoner and has expressed remorse for his crimes. The Ministry of Justice rejected his previous parole applications basically because of concerns about recidivism.
Psychiatrists who participated in the reviews of the Wolf's case have also expressed such concerns. At one point, Yang said he would be willing to undergo chemical castration in order to suppress his biological urges. This means that he knows that he may not be able to control his urges even though he may have sincerely repented -- especially if placed in an environment teeming with the kind of victim he favored, college students.
The aura attached to Taida is another reason why this case has received so much media attention. It is the nation's premier university. Its coeds are the darlings of the nation, so few people appear willing to risk exposing them to even a penitent Wolf.
Almost every women's group in the nation is against granting him parole. Supporters of the reformed Wolf point out that his test scores were quite impressive and that he has the right to receive education and should be given a chance to remake himself. They have also pointed out that he can only be kept isolated from society for the length of his 17-year term, so he will be released within a decade. Depriving him of an opportunity to study at the university could create a lifelong bitterness in him -- which could lead to a desire to retaliate against society after his release, they say. Yet women, whether at Taida or elsewhere, also have the right not to be placed at risk.
The best solution appears to be a compromise -- some special arrangement that will allow him to start his college studies, through correspondence courses or long-distance learning via the Internet, yet keep him off campus. Officials and experts have yet to determine if there is a legal basis for paroling inmates who are taking correspondence courses.
If there is no legal basis for such a move, a law should be enacted quickly. According to Taida, the Wolf's test qualification will only last for another year. If he can't matriculate this year, the Ministry of Justice will have another year to work out regulations tailor-made for him.
Such a move can't be helped. Not everyone is equal before the law. Complex laws are the price we have to pay to take care of everyone's rights.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers