First, a hit television epic challenging official history was yanked off the air. Then came a blatant about-face by a health official, an opaque Shanghai banking probe and abrupt curbs on the press.
The developments, Chinese sources say, signal inner strife between increasingly confident Communist Party boss Hu Jintao (
They said Jiang, who remains chief of the nation's vast military machine, had made calculated stabs to reassert his authority in recent weeks. Hu supporters have cried foul.
"It's not an overt struggle. It's a covert struggle," said one party official of an intrigue unfolding at a critical juncture.
Hu was preparing to mark the party's birthday last Tuesday with a speech expected to touch on "inner party democracy."
In the run-up to the event, journalists and intellectuals fuelled hopes Hu would push for faster systematic change and increased openness after the embarrassing cover-up of the SARS epidemic and a rash of legal scandals.
But analysts see the cautious Hu taking only small steps toward political reform, particularly with Jiang still in the wings.
"Under these circumstances, Hu has to be careful," said one party newspaper editor. "He will not bring up much that is new."
Hu, 60, was once seen as prone to pressure by Jiang and his allies known as the "Shanghai Gang." But by declaring an all-out "people's war" on SARS, he has established himself quicker than expected since becoming president in March.
By contrast, Jiang drew flak after the army's initial refusal to disclose SARS cases, the dismissal of health minister Zhang Wenkang (張文康) -- once Jiang's personal physician -- and the aloofness of his camp during the SARS campaign. The Shanghai probe into improper loans to property barons could also taint Jiang allies.
Frictions have surfaced.
Early last month, talk spread that party elders had written a letter urging Jiang to retire.
The petition, signed by Hu's patron Song Ping (
"They basically wrote, `Your handling of SARS and other matters is affecting the current leaders' leadership.'"
Jiang, 76, has not taken criticism lying down.
"The West is capitalizing on the Iraq war and SARS to pressure China. That's what Jiang is saying," the editor said.
In late May, when Hu made his first trip abroad as president to Russia and France, Jiang swooped into Beijing from his home in Shanghai, three sources said.
The first person he met was Zhang, they said. The two nibbled dumplings, another editor added, in a meeting clearly aimed at exculpating the disgraced health boss.
Then on May 30, vice health minister Gao Qiang (
But state media criticized Gao and, one source said, superiors rebuked him. Two weeks later, he reversed himself, blaming Zhang for the slow response to SARS and the weakness of the health system.
In Hu's absence, Jiang also made an abortive bid to have his closest ally, Vice President Zeng Qinghong (
A Jiang ally proposed the move, which could have set a precedent for Zeng, fifth in the party hierarchy and chief pretender, to replace Hu at top meetings. Other leaders objected, they said.
Official media are exhorting renewed study of Jiang's "Three Represents" theory to widen the party's base; Hu has also paid tribute. There has been only isolated fanfare about "inner party democracy."
While some scholars say Hu could raise specifics like local multi-candidate elections, others say he is more likely to be vague.
"The ghost of Jiang Zemin lingers," one said.
Party censors banned free reporting on sensitive subjects, particularly the Shanghai probe, and analysts expect Jiang allies in the Politburo to escape the fallout from the investigation.
Gang Lin, of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said the leadership line-up was carefully balanced. "No one can easily break it."
The sources said Hu was behind the cancellation of a television drama that portrayed a more sympathetic view of Empress Dowager Cixi (1835 to 1908), traditionally vilified as a tyrant who ruled from behind the curtain -- reflecting well on Jiang and poorly on Hu.
"Hu has new ideas, but what does he do? He still does things the old way," said the party editor. "This system runs the way it runs. He has to rely on this system to realize his own ideas."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers