First, a hit television epic challenging official history was yanked off the air. Then came a blatant about-face by a health official, an opaque Shanghai banking probe and abrupt curbs on the press.
The developments, Chinese sources say, signal inner strife between increasingly confident Communist Party boss Hu Jintao (
They said Jiang, who remains chief of the nation's vast military machine, had made calculated stabs to reassert his authority in recent weeks. Hu supporters have cried foul.
"It's not an overt struggle. It's a covert struggle," said one party official of an intrigue unfolding at a critical juncture.
Hu was preparing to mark the party's birthday last Tuesday with a speech expected to touch on "inner party democracy."
In the run-up to the event, journalists and intellectuals fuelled hopes Hu would push for faster systematic change and increased openness after the embarrassing cover-up of the SARS epidemic and a rash of legal scandals.
But analysts see the cautious Hu taking only small steps toward political reform, particularly with Jiang still in the wings.
"Under these circumstances, Hu has to be careful," said one party newspaper editor. "He will not bring up much that is new."
Hu, 60, was once seen as prone to pressure by Jiang and his allies known as the "Shanghai Gang." But by declaring an all-out "people's war" on SARS, he has established himself quicker than expected since becoming president in March.
By contrast, Jiang drew flak after the army's initial refusal to disclose SARS cases, the dismissal of health minister Zhang Wenkang (張文康) -- once Jiang's personal physician -- and the aloofness of his camp during the SARS campaign. The Shanghai probe into improper loans to property barons could also taint Jiang allies.
Frictions have surfaced.
Early last month, talk spread that party elders had written a letter urging Jiang to retire.
The petition, signed by Hu's patron Song Ping (
"They basically wrote, `Your handling of SARS and other matters is affecting the current leaders' leadership.'"
Jiang, 76, has not taken criticism lying down.
"The West is capitalizing on the Iraq war and SARS to pressure China. That's what Jiang is saying," the editor said.
In late May, when Hu made his first trip abroad as president to Russia and France, Jiang swooped into Beijing from his home in Shanghai, three sources said.
The first person he met was Zhang, they said. The two nibbled dumplings, another editor added, in a meeting clearly aimed at exculpating the disgraced health boss.
Then on May 30, vice health minister Gao Qiang (
But state media criticized Gao and, one source said, superiors rebuked him. Two weeks later, he reversed himself, blaming Zhang for the slow response to SARS and the weakness of the health system.
In Hu's absence, Jiang also made an abortive bid to have his closest ally, Vice President Zeng Qinghong (
A Jiang ally proposed the move, which could have set a precedent for Zeng, fifth in the party hierarchy and chief pretender, to replace Hu at top meetings. Other leaders objected, they said.
Official media are exhorting renewed study of Jiang's "Three Represents" theory to widen the party's base; Hu has also paid tribute. There has been only isolated fanfare about "inner party democracy."
While some scholars say Hu could raise specifics like local multi-candidate elections, others say he is more likely to be vague.
"The ghost of Jiang Zemin lingers," one said.
Party censors banned free reporting on sensitive subjects, particularly the Shanghai probe, and analysts expect Jiang allies in the Politburo to escape the fallout from the investigation.
Gang Lin, of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said the leadership line-up was carefully balanced. "No one can easily break it."
The sources said Hu was behind the cancellation of a television drama that portrayed a more sympathetic view of Empress Dowager Cixi (1835 to 1908), traditionally vilified as a tyrant who ruled from behind the curtain -- reflecting well on Jiang and poorly on Hu.
"Hu has new ideas, but what does he do? He still does things the old way," said the party editor. "This system runs the way it runs. He has to rely on this system to realize his own ideas."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US