Jolted by bombings in its capital and a shootout with militants in Mecca, Saudi Arabia is trying to heal internal rifts and tackle the threat of al-Qaeda by talking to religious minorities and former dissidents.
Alongside a sustained security clampdown after the suicide bombings in Riyadh, blamed on Saudi-born Osama bin Laden's group, de facto ruler Crown Prince Abdullah launched a "national dialogue" to address political and religious differences.
A four-day meeting last week brought together Sunnis and minority Shiites -- who have long complained of second-class treatment in the strict Sunni Muslim kingdom -- as well as government figures and a former dissident who was once jailed.
"It was the first meeting of its kind and we consider it a good, and belated, initiative," the country's most prominent Shiite cleric Hassan al-Saffar, a former exile, said. "This should have happened a long time ago."
Shiites, who live mainly in the oil-rich Eastern Province, make up nearly 10 percent of the population in Saudi Arabia, which enforces an austere Wahhabi version of Sunni Islam.
They have complained for decades of inequality at the hands of a powerful religious establishment, saying it refused to acknowledge Shiites as true Muslims.
Saudi Arabia's Ismaili Muslims, from the southwestern border region near Yemen, were also represented at the talks.
"The most important result of the meeting was breaking the barriers between the different [religious] trends," Saffar said, adding that differences would not be resolved overnight.
Diplomats say a possible rise of Shiite power in Iraq after the fall of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein has alarmed Riyadh, although there has been little sign its Shiite population wants to break away.
"It's much less of an issue for the government right now than Sunni extremism," said one Western diplomat, referring to the May 12 suicide bombings in Riyadh that killed 35 people.
Saudi Arabia says al-Qaeda was behind that attack and a gunfight in the holy city of Mecca in which seven people died.
Dozens of suspects have been arrested. And, in a tacit admission that militancy is partly a home-grown problem, clerics were told to preach moderation.
The birthplace of Islam, Saudi Arabia has come under US pressure to curb religious radicals since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on US cities by hijacked planes. Fifteen of the 19 hijack suspects were Saudis.
Saffar said Riyadh faced danger from both Western demands and militant violence. "These outside circumstances and internal dangers ... pushed Prince Abdullah in this direction [dialogue]."
The meeting ended with a declaration acknowledging diversity of Muslim thought in Saudi Arabia. It also sought more political participation in an absolute monarchy and fair distribution of resources in the world's largest oil exporter.
Saudi Arabia faces growing economic challenges such as a rapidly rising population and significant unemployment that have not been addressed by the slow pace of reform.
Without mentioning al-Qaeda, the declaration called for restrictions on the right to declare jihad and for ways to protect religion in the face of modern communication.
Al-Qaeda and its supporters have made wide use of the Internet to spread their message in Saudi Arabia.
Sheikh Salman al Audah, a Sunni preacher who spent five years in jail accused of sowing dissent and chaos after he called for even stricter interpretation of Islamic law in Saudi Arabia, said the meeting was a "successful beginning."
"But we don't expect very much from it," he added.
Another prominent Sunni preacher imprisoned with Audah in the 1990s, Safar al-Hawali, stayed away from the meeting.
Diplomats say despite an agreement to continue the dialogue, the attempt to bridge internal differences could be a one-off.
A junior minister who was at the talks said that simply by taking place, the meeting broke new ground.
"It is enough just that these people came together. Some said they thought it would last just 15 minutes. But they were surprised by the openness," the junior minister said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers