Taiwan's request to join the World Health Organization (WHO) as an observer was once again rejected. The reason, of course, was China's thuggish obstruction. Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
Relations across the Taiwan Strait will once again return to the confrontational cycle of international zero-sum games. China will pay a price for this, helping Taiwan to gain even more international sympathy on the WHO participation issue, and at the same time creating even more revulsion among the Taiwanese public toward China's suppression.
During the 16th National Congress last November, then president Jiang Zemin (
In fact, before the congress, then premier Zhu Rongji (
According to this new definition, China would no longer emphasize that Taiwan is part of China, much less one of its provinces. Rather, relations between Taiwan and the mainland would be equal under "one China." At the congress, the party formally incorporated this new definition into its documents in an effort to express China's sincerity.
In addition, in his report Jiang said that under the "one China" premise, the two sides should "discuss the international space in which the Taiwan region may conduct economic, cultural and social activities compatible with its status." As for the issue of Taiwan joining international organizations as a sovereign entity, interviews that I conducted in China at the time suggested that Beijing was not opposed to the two sides discussing the matter and exchanging views under the "one China" principle in order to seek an approach acceptable to both sides.
But this new thinking on Taiwan has died an early death over the WHO issue. As for the definition of "one China," Wu's description has even regressed to the one that was in place before Jiang's "Eight Points" of 1995. As for the issue of Taiwan's participation in international bodies, Wu's stance is a complete rejection of the flexible approach presented by Jiang at the congress.
According to reports, China's Taiwan affairs agencies once suggested that the matter be handled in a more flexible manner, and that Taiwan be allowed to join the WHO under the "one China" principle. But in the end these suggestions were not adopted by the top leadership.
The significance of the early demise of China's new thinking on Taiwan deserves further study. Has the fourth-generation leadership led by President Hu Jintao (
Will they return to a pragmatic approach? Or could it be that the new leadership does not yet have the experience and wisdom to handle the Taiwan issue? Or that the congress report was simply propaganda, aimed at testing cross-strait relations and pressuring the DPP government into making more concessions on the "one China" issue?
Since the congress report came out, there have been strong, persistent suspicions within Taiwan about China's new thinking.
There has been the belief that it was only a trick -- part of China's "united front" international propaganda, and aimed at, in concert with opposition parties here, into pressuring the DPP into accepting "one China." And that Beijing was not sincere about settling the issue of who has the right to represent Taiwan in the international community.
Today, Wu's remarks have precisely attested to Taiwan's suspicions and ruined China's credibility.
In the future, China will find it harder to win this country's trust even if it comes up with new rhetoric. The confrontation between the two sides of the Strait in the international arena will intensify.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant research fellow at the Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers