After putting down Taiwan's bid to gain observer status in the WHO earlier this month, Beijing has gone on to pressure the WTO Secretariat in an attempt to downgrade Taiwan's status in the trade body -- to the same level as the Chinese territory of Hong Kong.
The news prompted all political parties in Taiwan to unanimously condemn China's thuggish behavior. Such unanimity is unprecedented in the DPP's three years in power. Perhaps it is also a surprise for Beijing, which has always tried to cajole Taiwan's opposition parties into accepting "one China." For example, the PFP, which has always been friendly with Beijing and has always echoed "one China," has condemned China's behavior via its legislative caucus. Beijing has caused the two sides of the Strait to drift further apart and seriously hurt the feelings of the Taiwanese people, the caucus said in a statement.
As this newspaper made clear in this column yesterday, China's behavior runs counter to international law. On a technical level, Taiwan joined the WTO under the name "Permanent Mission of the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" (TPKM). Hong Kong and Macau, meanwhile, joined as a "separate customs territory of China."
Taiwan's status is based on Article 33 of the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT), while that of Hong Kong and Macau is based on Article 26. In other words, Taiwan has a completely different status than Hong Kong and Macau. Besides, the GATT reached a consensus in 1992 that Taiwan would join the trade body under the name TPKM, not as a customs territory of China.
Everyone knows that the WTO is an economic organization set up for the purpose of promoting free trade. It is not a political organization. China has tried to assert its sovereignty claim over Taiwan by creating a political conflict in a non-political organization. But such behavior will not only appear absurd in the eyes of other members, but will also trigger more disgust among the Taiwanese public. The opposition parties, which have long harbored illusions about the Beijing leadership, are now under enormous pressure from public opinion and have no choice other than to join in the condemnation.
So far more than 30 countries have been affected by the SARS epidemic, to which China has contributed by its attempts at a cover-up in the early phases. Up to yesterday, 76 people have died in Taiwan. And the outbreak in Taiwan might not have peaked yet. But China continues to ignore public sentiment in Taiwan and carries on with its political suppression. This is completely unacceptable to the people of Taiwan. We agree with TSU Chairman Huang Chu-wen (黃主文), who stressed that excluding issues such as the name of the nation and the national anthem from a future referendum law will be tantamount to the people of Taiwan giving up their sovereignty as well as their future generations' claim to sovereignty. If we limit the scope of the referendum law to economic issues, then we will be yielding to China's ambitions to make Taiwan a local government.
If the opposition parties are sincere about defending Taiwan's interests, then they should do more than grandstanding. They should take unanimous action alongside the ruling party on the referendum issue by allowing the people of Taiwan to determine their future through a democratic procedure. Only through a referendum can the people of Taiwan persuade the international community that they are a political entity independent from China. Only then can they highlight the fact that Beijing's claims have no support whatsoever from the Taiwanese public.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past