It's only been one-and-a-half years since Taiwan and China joined the WTO. For China, however, this seems to have been an unbearably long eon, for it is already working hard to demolish the agreed conditions under which the two sides joined the organization by mounting an assault on Taiwan's status in the WTO.
China has pressured WTO Secretary-General Supachai Panitchpakdi to change the name of Taiwan's WTO mission to an "office," to add a caveat in all official documents indicating that the mission does not represent a sovereign state and to downgrade the diplomatic protocol for Taiwanese officials at the organization.
This nation already endured inappropriate treatment in the process of joining the WTO because of the China factor. The fact that Taiwan joined the trade body as the "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" was a demeaning arrangement to begin with. But knowing substance is more important than names, Taiwan accepted the arrangement. Even though the government completed the negotiations necessary for WTO entry much earlier than China, this nation's entry was delayed for several years due to a tacit agreement that Taiwan should join at the same time as China.
China's flouting of WTO agreements, its attempt to pressure the WTO secretariat and change the status of a member, is a violation of international law and precedent. The government must protest strongly against such an action. The WTO secretariat should not be yielding to political pressure or taking unilateral action that harms the interests of a member state. People in this country and around the world should clearly recognize China's flagrant flouting of international conventions as well as its thuggish behavior. If Beijing can succeed in flouting the agreements on WTO entry, how can it maintain credibility for the international treaties it has signed or business agreements with other countries?
China has offered to donate medical supplies to Taiwan to help it fight the SARS epidemic and launched a massive propaganda drive in its media trumpeting its love for "Taiwan compatriots." Had the government accepted such donations -- meager as they were -- China would have created the impression that it had Taiwan's health-care needs well in hand. Fortunately, the Straits Exchange Foundation rejected the offer and stopped China's scheme cold.
After China's behavior in blocking this nation's bid for WHO observership, some pan-blue legislators asked for negotiations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. But now, with Beijing trying to press Taiwan to the wall at the WTO, can we still harbor any illusion about Beijing's intentions?
Apparently Beijing has not appreciated Taiwan's willingness to settle for WTO membership as something other than a sovereign state. If the result is going to be the same no matter how many concessions the government is willing to make, then it might as well seek WHO membership as a sovereign state. Even if it loses such a bid, Taiwan should continue to promote its status as a sovereign state in the international community.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past