With the end of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's regime, the scope of his brutalization of the Iraqi people is becoming clear. Mass graves are being unearthed and torture chambers opened. Countless Iraqis now openly recount horrifying stories of the murder and disappearance of loved ones.
In the other Arab states, the political leadership and the media have not dwelled much on these aspects of Saddam's rule. They have good reason for avoiding such close scrutiny. Many of them benefited directly from Saddam's rule. Examining what he did in Iraq means examining their own role in supporting more than three decades of brutality.
The heyday of Saddam's relations with the Arab world came during the Iran-Iraq war during the 1980s. Saddam's attack on Iran allayed the fears of Arab regimes that Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran would export its Islamic revolution. The late Jordanian monarch King Hussein would join Saddam in inspecting the frontlines. The Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, offered Saddam massive financial and media support.
Egypt's centers of power, such as its army, businessmen, journalists and ideological parties, played a prominent role in supporting Saddam's war against Iran. Syria was the sole exception to this chorus of Arab approval for Saddam, because its late leader, President Hafez al Assad, had aligned himself with Iran.
Saddam's brutality within Iraq also served his neighbors' purposes. He repressed the Shiites, the traditional opponents of Sunni-dominated regimes in the region. He suppressed the Kurds, reassuring both Turkey and Syria, countries with sizeable -- and restive -- minority populations of their own. Indeed, by stifling any hint of democracy or political opposition in Iraq, Saddam's police state eliminated all risk of possible contagion of neighboring states.
Outside Iraq, Saddam understood the uses of wealth and influence as a means of gaining friends. He put his oil reserves to good use, providing Jordan and Syria -- each a failing economy -- with deeply discounted supplies, assuring their goodwill.
Saddam also focussed his attention on the media in the Arab world, understanding their power in controlling and regimenting an audience. Saddam spent unreservedly, buying off politicians, journalists, writers and artists in Iraq, the Arab world and beyond. Through a large and interlocking network of security and media organizations, Saddam financed scores of newspapers and magazines, lavishing on their hack writers sums of money that were unimaginable to ordinary Arab journalists.
A political-intelligence-media network was constantly at work. Arab writers and artists invited to Saddam-sponsored cultural events would invariably find a pleasant surprise when opening brief cases distributed as presents -- wads of dollars would be stuffed inside. For favored supporters, the rewards could be much greater: mansions, luxurious apartments, the latest cars.
Dozens of Arab intellectuals engaged in this kind of business with Saddam. In the Arab world many of these people are literary celebrities, film idols, and media stars. Recently discovered documents reveal that hundreds of them received money and gifts from Saddam or his henchmen.
At the center of this network were the cultural organizations that Saddam established in Arab and other capitals. Iraqi embassies acted as media centers, along with their despicable role in hunting dissidents of all political stripes. The sole concern of these lavishly-funded front organizations was to sell Saddam abroad and discredit his opponents.
I experienced directly the difficulty of trying to offer an alternative view of Iraq and its cultural life. With a group of colleagues, I established a modest cultural group, with no external support whatsoever. We had a terrible time trying to publish our writings or getting coverage of the society's activities. I remember how much we agonized before we could print our first literary review, Al-Badeel (The Alternative).
In the Arab region, Saddam manipulated people's sentiments by feeding them an ever-changing diet of secular, Islamist and nationalist slogans. He crowned these with his call to liberate Palestine "from the river to the sea," that is, the destruction of Israel, outdoing the Palestinian leaders themselves. Indeed, it was Saddam who added the words "God is great" in his own handwriting to the Iraqi flag.
Saddam also assigned his deputy Izzat Ibrahim to lead a so-called "faith drive." The campaign was designed to serve several purposes, including the suppression of any free, secular thinking. On a wider scale, it was meant to influence and win over Arab and Muslim minds by hollow but bombastic rhetoric. Unfortunately, many Arabs, rulers and ruled alike, fell for it.
With the end of Saddam's regime, Iraq faces a reckoning for decades of physical brutality and cultural intimidation. Iraqis will have to revisit concepts -- like nationalism, sovereignty and Islamic community -- that have never come under critical examination. How the Arab world reacts to Iraq's reckoning, and whether other Arabs will face their own complicity in Saddam's legacy, will tell us a great deal about what sort of Arab societies the future will bring.
Awad Nasir is an Iraqi poet still exiled in London, where he works as a writer and editor.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused