The SARS virus has no eyes, and our bodies are pretty much the same regardless of our class. Wherever there are weaknesses, the virus can invade. Nevertheless, in the transmission of the virus as well as in channels for disease prevention, there are differences between people arising due to variations in the quantity of social resources they can afford.
Those who have higher incomes can obtain more complete and accurate information and have more resources to protect themselves (eg channels for buying high-quality surgical masks and use of private vehicles instead of taking public transportation). People from relatively disadvantaged social groups, especially foreign workers and the homeless, lack sufficient information and resources to protect themselves.
In the battle against SARS, they have become the ones who are sacrificed on the front lines and become suspected of being dangerous transmitters of the disease.
Four foreign caregivers have lost their lives due to SARS. They died on the job, but their passing received no accolades. Such a high number shows that the work of foreign caregivers exposes them to a high degree of risk. The patients they accompany and care for are frequently in the hospital or visit hospitals regularly.
Generally, these caregivers work year round with no vacation and are on call 24 hours a day. Caregivers are positioned at the bottom reaches of the health-care system. They have long-term, direct contact with patients, but unlike other health-care workers, they lack the professional equipment and training that could give them appropriate protection.
Even more unfortunate is that because they work in a foreign land, most of them can not obtain sufficient information to understand SARS and protect themselves because of the language barrier or lack of access to the media.
For foreign maids and caregivers who work in their employers' homes, the Monday through Saturday work week is like living under quarantine. Only on their time off on Sunday can they come out for some fresh air, see a few friends and enjoy a brief moment of freedom. Public spaces such as train stations become their "home," where they can feel truly at ease. Under attack from SARS, they have been forced to abandon such gathering places to avoid the risk of exposure to the virus.
The Foreign Worker's Counseling Centers in each city and county should quickly draw up and disseminate information about SARS in foreign workers' native languages as well as provide surgical masks in order to help them establish effectively protection themselves.
In recent weeks, we have also heard that some employers use the SARS threat as a justification to prohibit their foreign workers from taking time off, and at the same time, they have not paid their workers overtime as stipulated by law.
Taking time off is a basic human right of workers. It should not be forcibly taken away from them. Employers should instead provide sufficient information to their workers and suggest that they go to relatively safe open spaces. This will allow foreign workers to increase their immun-ity to disease through rest and at the same time protect employers themselves from infection.
The homeless people in Taipei's Wanhua District have also been considered dangerous disease carriers who could ignite a local outbreak of SARS. These people on the margins of society are unable to live a mainstream life because of job loss, mental illness, abandonment by their families, or some other factor. For a long time they have been solitary figures going unnoticed by the general public. But suddenly, in the midst of the panic over SARS, they have been put under the spotlight and have become a pariah.
The Taipei City Government's demand that all homeless people wear surgical masks is a violation of their human rights and an order based on one isolated case. Just because one journalist was infected with SARS, can we demand that all journalists must wear surgical masks wherever they go?
The existence of homeless people and their possible infections reflect the deficiencies of the social security system and the government's inability to develop a relatively comprehensive system to protect and help them live respectable lives.
Confronted with today's dangerous virus, the majority of people in this country choose to stay at home and reduce activities that takes them outside, but homeless people can only remain on the streets where sanitary conditions are poor. By the same token, they are a forgotten corner of the network distributing information on SARS.
What they need now are resources and protection, not exclusion and stigmatization.
In this battle against the virus of the century, panic has caused us to begin doubting and leveling accusations against one another. Foreign workers and street people have naturally been associated with sources of danger to public health. This sort of stigmatizing discourse won't solve the problem of SARS and will, in fact, exacerbate it.
The rapid spread of SARS across borders has made us aware that society, and even the entire earth, is one collective living organism. Marginalization of underprivileged groups and indifference toward safeguards on their rights will ultimately threaten the interests of all humanity.
Lan Pei-chia is an assistant professor in the department of sociology at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past