The SARS storm, which probably originated from Foshan in China's Guangdong Province, has swept across the globe. The ailment has created a panic among the public because it is virulent, spreads rapidly and has a high mortality rate.
But it seems that some people in this nation are not that afraid of SARS. On the one hand, they call for the adoption of some measures to contain the spread of SARS, but on the other, they open up the back door for the sake of some uncertain benefits, leaving a loophole for SARS.
Based on the SARS virus genetic sequences released recently by different countries, the Biomedical Engineering Center of the Industrial Technology Research Institute conducted cross comparisons through nucleic acid and protein-sequential analyses. The results show that the SARS virus genetic sequences from Canada and Hong Kong are nearly identical, with similarities as high as 99.96 percent. It can be deduced that the two places contracted SARS from the same origin.
The dean of National Taiwan University's medical college, Chen Ding-shinn (陳定信), has said that the university's experiment confirmed that Taiwan's SARS virus is 99 percent similar to those from Canada and Hong Kong. No mutation was detected. This implies that the SARS virus spreading in Taiwan and Canada came from Hong Kong, which also means the epidemic in the three places all originated in Guangdong Province.
From a public health view-point, to prevent the spread of SARS, it is necessary for the government to block the entry of China's SARS carriers. The best way is to prohibit the entry of people from China.
The Cabinet recently promulgated new disease-control measures, demanding that all those arriving from China or other SARS-affected areas listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) be quarantined for 10 days. Heavy penalties will be meted out to violators.
In addition, the government also formulated the Temporary Provisions for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Prevention and Relief (嚴重急性呼吸道症候群防治及紓困暫行條例) on May 2 to strengthen its anti-SARS efforts, safeguard people's health and deal with the economic and social impact of the epidemic.
However, it is puzzling that as the government adopted the above measures to contain the epidemic, it was also considering offering chartered flights to bring home China-based Taiwanese busi-nesspeople infected with SARS.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) also said that, to ensure the nation's competitive edge in the Asia-Pacific region, the government should seriously assess a timetable for providing cargo transportation services across the Taiwan Strait and complete the formulation of the plan as soon as possible.
Why did the government bring up the cross-strait cargo issue in the middle of the concerted efforts to prevent SARS? We do not know the inside story. But DPP heavyweight Hong Chi-chang (
Therefore, according to Hong, the government must open up cross-strait cargo transportation to reduce business costs in China, thereby making up for the losses inflicted by the SARS outbreak.
Apparently, Hong and other DPP members have only busi-nesspeople, not the people of Taiwan, in mind. To reduce the cost of doing business in China, Taiwanese will have to risk their lives and social instability as well as a sluggish economy.
To prevent the import of SARS, more than 90 countries have imposed control measures against China, including stopping visa issuance, forbidding the entry of Chinese citizens and laborers, or implementing compulsory health checkups for visitors from China.
While countries not on antagonistic terms with China can deny the entry of Chinese nationals, Taiwan -- which has been bullied by Beijing for years and harmed by its SARS epidemic -- does not ban the entry of Chinese but, instead, tries to speed up the planning of cross-strait cargo services, leaving a hole in its epidemic prevention network.
The DPP must provide the public with a clear explanation why it wants to work out a plan for cross-strait transportation services as soon as possible. Otherwise, people might suspect that the government was not established by a real "native son of Taiwan."
Kuo Cheng-deng is a principal investigator of the Department of Medical Research and Education at Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers